discussed in court today. in addition, we allege violations of statutes like -- it may sound technical, but the administrative procedures act. well, that's not technical -- for example, president obama's, the dreamers act that he put into place was shut down because of a claim based on that act, for example, when republican ags sued the obama administration. so we have two different buckets of claims, and the judge felt we were likely to prevail on the merits when he ultimately decides on that, and that is part of why he granted our temporary restraining order this evening. >> so, does -- this is a dumb question, but does your case then continue in front of this judge? >> no, it's not a dumb question at all, anderson. this can be a little confusing. yes, eventually, the judge will reach what we call the merits, make a final decision. but i think it's fair to say, most lawyers would say that if a judge grants you that temporary restraining order, because one of the requirements to do it is the judge concluding you are ultimately likely to prevail on the merits, that bodes well for our case, as you might imagine.