before he was president, he his a long history of threatening to take legal action again nearly anything written against him that he didn't like. so david, obviously no president ever likes their press coverage or everything that's written about them. to go so far to suggest changing libel laws, which is not something the president can unilaterally do is odd or disturbing, to say the least. >> i agree. let's go back to the basics. the laws are controlled by case decided by the supreme court in 1964 called "new york times" versus sullivan. it was a 9-0 decision which said in order for a public figure to sue somebody for libel and succeed, you not only had to prove that the statement -- the critical statement was false, but you also have to prove actual malice, that the personal or the publication making the