transparency, fine. but with specific to trump, i did some googling of him on google about news. i saw fox news in there. i saw other outlets. they're trying to call this p.j. media, which is just a conservative site. it's not a research clearinghouse. it's not the kato institute. it was used because it had a headline that said 96% of media -- of news coverage of trump is negative from liberal groups. reuters? cbs? of course cnn. those are fringe groups? 96% is negative. that's the reality of coverage with what the president puts out. >> so then, chris, you should have no concerns whatsoever to making the algorithms transparent for the american people to decide whether there's a bias or not. >> none. have the government do it. i think that's fine. i just don't think you do it because trump says it's rigged against him. >> it's been an issue that has been rising in concern among many republicans, and i think there's a concern that many conservatives turn to these platforms to get information because they believe the mainstream bias --