>> it seems like there is a lot of -- >> look, you can make any arguments you can. right. yeah. so it's totally hypotheticcritid totally different as well. steve right. there is the national emergencies act, and lo and behold, that requires a national emergency. so he has to point, trump has to point to something that is a national emergency. and here we have really good indicia that there isn't one. all 31 prior times, including burundi, the statute was implemented not in defiance of what congress wanted, but because there was an emergency gap and not time or attention by congress to a specific situation. here you really have the paradigmatic opposite. the wall was an issue in the 2018 election. trump lost. the wall is why trump tried to shut down the government in congress. he lost. and now he's claiming as a loser the national emergency card when that's exactly the thing that was rejected before. and by the way, it's not the way