rights. congress could change the statute to broaden the interest or the rights on either side. and what the court did say is that they really are workable work arounds and that certain, only a certain privately held corporations founded and staffed by lereligious folk could be treated more like the law treats churches and other full blown religious organizations. there are work arounds. so maybe this looms -- this case looms bigger in the culture wars than in the actual world. it doesn't throw a monkey wrench in the system. more like a pair of tweezers. >> it really is. it's a balancing test on both sides. and one question also is, of course, how much burden the exemption places on these employees. and it is actually cynics argue, people who support this ruling argue, a modest amount every month that individuals would