down, you know, some of the earlier laws that they upheld, what they still did was put the people going in and out of massachusetts clinics, at further risk than they are now. it's already a very volatile situation. the political leanings of certain members of the court become more clear every year. i mean, when it comes to scalia, he's become even more robustly sort of defending what he says is constitutional originalism, but somehow always seems to line up with what fox news is saying. >> yeah. >> he actually wrote a concurrence in this decision in which he claimed that, you know, not only was this law unconstitutional, but it discriminated against antiabortion viewpoints. he wanted the court to go even further. while we think this will probably invalidate other buffer zones around the country, if challenges are brought to those, scalia wanted all of the protections to be gone. >> yeah. it is sort of surprising that there is no, i guess, ethical requirement that justices s ree themselves.