Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com
next day and say, oh, let's go to work and be a lawyer in a functioning court. i know judges had the same view, which is how to actually do this when the supreme court is not a model of the rule of law? i do think here original point, there's an irony here, which is you have dobbs came out, you had justice thomas, two point, signaling that this is step one, because he's basically saying there's no reason that all of these things shouldn't be reversed. but you have the political reaction. so, yes, it only takes five, as justice o'connor used to say, with the supreme court about, it's five. you just have to get to that number. but if they continue down this road, there is a sort of real potential political silver lining, which we saw in the midterms. >> yeah. i want to just raise this issue. because i think the only answer -- you can get to this place of impotent -- about the court. because honestly, i don't think the votes are gonna be able to expand the court. i don't think so. that might change overtime, but when you think this, look at the approval rating in the u.s.