Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com
case with significant election consequences, at the supreme court, 6-3. so, these are not -- i really caution into saying they're going to definitely rule one way or the other because of politics. that's just not how the court operates. i'd say one other thing about what lisa and andrew were saying a moment ago about the question presented at the court. i guess i disagree a little with my colleagues. it's very rare for the supreme court to rewrite the questions that the petitioner, that is the person asking the supreme court to hear the case, rare that the court will actually do that. in my hundreds of cases at the court, it's only happened a few times. it's not surprising to me the court heard what it generally does, taking the question as the way the petitioner here, donald trump, framed it out to be. i don't think that tells us very much about all the questions that the court has really focused on. i think they're just at this point focused on all of the above, on everything, and they didn't want to do anything