The Still Enduring Features of the Debate Over Missile Defen

The debate over missile defense has shifted from whether missile defense should be pursued as a matter of principle to whether deploying such a defense will be effective in practice. Victory inthe debate over the principle of fielding a missile defense must befollowed by victory in the debate over fielding a truly effectivedefense for the American people.

Related Keywords

Australia , Taiwan , Japan , United States , Iran , Alaska , China , California , Syria , Canada , Russia , Pakistan , India , Israel , Saudi Arabia , North Korea , South Korea , Americans , America , North Korean , Soviet , American , Carl Levin , Jamesm Buchanan , Georgew Bush , Bill Clinton , Shelby Cullom Davis Institute For International , Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance , Group On , Bush Administration , Heritage Foundation , Members Of Congress , Sarah Allison Center , Senate Armed Services Committee , Member Of Congress , Clinton Administration , Technology Kill Vehicle , Senator Carl Levin , Independent Working Group , Debate Stands , President George , Ballistic Missile , Bush Adminis , Brilliant Pebbles , President Bill Clinton , Advanced Technology Kill Vehicle , Enduring Arguments , Missile Defense , Independent Work , Cold War , Soviet Union , President Bush , President Ronald Reagan , Strategic Defense Initia , United Methodist , Choice Theory , Senator Jon Kyl , Space Based Laser , Effective Missile Defense , Defense Authorization Bill , Alaska House , Baker Spring , Kirby Research Fellow , National Security Policy , Foreign Policy Studies , Shelby Cullom Davis Institute , International Studies ,