>> right. >> two we have to have a constitutional amendment to get money out of the game. at the same time the price tag is $2.5 billion they believe your campaign is going to try to raise. how can that be taken as a serious situation? i want a constitutional amendment when you are anything -- going to raise more money than anybody, hypocrisy? >> the $2.a billion i'm not sure where that came from. i think that includes people counting outside money. that's not a number that came from the campaign. but i take your point. but i think the point is you can't unilaterally disarm but that doesn't mean you think it's ridiculous to spend that kind of money and don't necessarily think we shouldn't keep trying on the other end. it also means, look yesterday she talked about things like the carried interest loophole for hedge funds. if that happens to be your business and you give to hillary's campaign you know where she stands. you know you're giving to someone that's what they believe. i think it was important for her to talk about the idea of a constitutional amendment, because again, you've got to push on the issue.