ruling you see what this federal judge thinks of that. and we knew that they were skeptical of this argument that the white house had been making about how essentially everyone was protected by this. but what you see in this is just how far it goes because this is much broader than just the former white house attorney. and whether or not he can go before congress. but it goes into national security officials as well which is essentially you're reading former national security adviser john bolton who is making the argument that his case is different from mcgahn's because he was so involved on these national security issues. the judge said, no, that is not the situation there. you cannot get this widespread, you know, point-blank ruling about whether or not someone can testify. >> that's on the mcgahn issue, it relates to witnesses appearing before congress. you have the tax issue now. and the supreme court putting a stay, but not really tipping its hand as to whether -- where it's going to decide in this case but it does say, you know, at least it's giving both sides an opportunity to make the case the supreme court should weigh in on this.