just the facts. >> what should the attorney general do with this now? >> run for cover. >> everyone is saying, include including the inspector general, this is a dissput between the intelligence agencies and igs over the freedom of information act and that is not a criminal referral. the "times" has misled and still wouldn't withdraw its mistake and explain why it landed on an anonymous report -- >> it's not fox new,s it ate "new york times" not exactly a conservative bastian that's raising this issue. >> i consider "the new york times" one of the great newspapers in the history of our country. when "the new york times" gets something wrong and it's possible it's inadvertent error, they omit deliberately in today's story. that's an intentional mission, that number one, they got wrong, that there was no labeling on these e-mails. they said it in today's paper. yesterday said it was not clear. there's a direct statement by