addendum. he's already tried to get right with the committee. >> that's one thing that blew my mind whichth is that we already know that he sort of came through an addendum. even with the addendum was not complete. >> there's going to be w an addendum to a the addendum. >> both individuals are sort of career diplomats, career foreign service folks. there is a kind of question at the heart of k this. almost ae constitutional questn about, like, who gets to say what american policy is, right? and i think you saw a theme from some of the president's defenders on the committee in theirfe tweets and their questioning, who are you bureaucrats to say thequ presidt can't do this? what do you make of that argument? >> it's the same kind of argument we saw shadowed in the daca adargument, the president n come in and change immigration policy. that is something the administration can comepodo, bu don't necessarily see the two witnesses today saying that they have a problem with the policy. iit think what they have a probm with is this idea that the president's policy shifts are