implicit in the belief that that's actually the case. of course, that's key to what we're seeing. a follow-up katie. this is reporting of a colleague of yours, not your buy lin of "the new york times." hundreds of people who have been processed through the legal system, that in at least one case an individual are said to have asked about trump's role in the january 6th riot which seems significant and maybe we haven't seen that yet in any of the charging documents that strack ka's lawyers says prosecutors wanted to know about any coordination with trump or his cutouts. >> so we haven't seen that in the charges documents. but we have seen people who have been charged by the justice department say that they did what they did, they came to the capitol on january 6th, that they legally entered the building, destroyed property, et cetera, because they believed that donald trump wanted them to. so this is actually an idea that