picked out, the fact that the law can't criminalize the conduct that the person who obtains the abortion engages in. all of that could change if we lose roe, and it's worth noting that many of the trump judicial appointees when they were questioned in the senate at their confirmation hearings, they would decline to agree to follow stare decisis, which says that all of the lower courts must follow supreme court cases and that even the supreme court honors long standing precedent and doesn't reverse it unless there are good, solid reasons to do that. the example that was used in many of those confirmations was brown versus board of education where you had this remarkable sight of federal judicial nominees who refused to say that they agreed brown was properly decided. now that opens up the notion that if roe versus wade is fair game, what else? what else among our time-honored rights or perhaps some of our newer rights might be vulnerable