Carolines point that they didnt charge them, conspiracy is nevertheless the agreement to do something the law forbids. It did dont on for decades. It was a relatively short period of time. Theres 34 counts, but theres really a much more limited number of acts that led to those 34 false documents. So prosecutors have to make it simple, avoid the simplistic, keep it linear and chronological, not overpromise and make sure they have a witness that will back up everything they say in the opening. This is not an inordinately complex thing to do. I forget who made the point earlier, but theyre exactly right. I think it was maya. If theres a weakness in your case, you front it. You want do make sure that the jury hears from you, the prosecutor, where the weaknesses are, where the traps may be. Otherwise then the defense gets to tell them and it looks like you as the prosecutor is hiding something. Its not an inordinately complex