campaign and committee have because, you know, this is going already raised more than $3 to be a test of a couple things. for one thing, its a distraction million, unlike when the trump from impeachment which came much campaign was like a shoestring, later than the cases that this time it's well financed, well staffed and very good developed into the supreme court technology operation. test. the other thing that is going to so in 2008 barack obama decided be a test is whether trump to reject public financing. he took a lot of heat for that remade the supreme court in the but he did it for one reason, he way that certainly he and his wanted to win. >> i'll quote one more line from advisors hope he has been able the piece. your colleagues write, that's not to say the issues don't to do. you know, he has appointed more matter. federal judges than any what is there room to talk about? as these candidates focus on president in recent memory and donald trump, what do you think maybe much longer than that. and your colleagues think is he's already had a chance to put fair game that democrats should two very conservative justices be hashing out here in the on the supreme court. coming months? he thinks he has more control >> one thing that strikes me from 2016 is that for all the over the supreme court than he polarization in the nation, the actually does. exit polls in 2016 showed that but he clearly believes that this is a court that is in 39% of voters self-identified as taking these cases at all, you moderate, 35% as conservative know, friendly to his view. they could have turned the cases