Live Breaking News & Updates on Acquit

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Acquit on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Acquit and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Trump Trial Today

currently understand the case, a key part of the da's case on that could change as a introduce evidence that maybe corroborates cohen. obviously, there's been some folks on the witness list who were all sort of wondering what are they gonna be testifying about but at least out of the gate, i would expect donald trump's lawyers to really be hammering on cohen and basically saying, this man is completely unreliable. he's lived every branch the federal government in the last few years, you shouldn't believe them now, if you don't believe them now you need to acquit donald trump. >> one thing i do want to add here about michael cohen is obviously donald trump has his gag order in place where he's not allowed to talk about the witnesses, but that does not apply to his small army of right-wing social media influencers. they are given the same access to information that all of us journalists it's are given, they're seeing pool reports and they are notoing to have e same restrictions that say we do are limitations. that's going to apply to both jurors, but also attacking michael cohen. they are going toork to paint him as a liar. they are going to work to say that ts case is based off of the testimony of liar and you're going tsee pretty rsh,arsh, viiol when i

Donald-j-trump , Evidence , Michael-cohen , Case , Folks , Witness-list , Part , Da , Sort , Gate , Lawyers , Thing

Trump Trial Today

of the da's case on that could change as a introduce evidence that may corroborates cohen. obviously, there have been some folks on the witness list who were all sort of wondering what are they going to be testifying about but at least out of the gate, i would expect donald trump's lawyers to really be hammering on cohen and basically saying this man is completely unreliable. he's lived every branch of the federal government in the last few years. you shouldn't believe them now, if you don't believe them now you need to acquit donald trump. >> and one thing i do want to add here about michael cohen is obviously donald trump has his gag order in place where he's not allowed to talk about the witnesses, but that does not apply to his small army of right-wing social media influencers. they are given the same access to information that all of us journalists are given. they're seeing pool reports and they're not going to have the same restriction let's say we do our limitations. that's going to apply to both jurors, but also attacking michael cohen. they are going to work to paint him as a liar. they are going to work to say that this case is based off of the testimony of a liar and you're going to see pretty hard, harsh, vitriol when it comes to these

Donald-j-trump , Michael-cohen , Evidence , Lawyers , Man , Case , Folks , Witness-list , Da , Hammering , Sort , Gate

Delhi High Court acquits 4 men in gang rape case; slams Delhi Police for shoddy probe

The Court criticised the trial court for getting carried away with prosecutrix's first statement and ignoring the fact that statement was later disowned by her.

Call-detail-records , Delhi-high-court , Gang-rape , Acquit , Acquittal , Trial-court , Wrong-conviction , Delhi-police , Criticise , Pawan-sharma-amp-orsv-state-govt-of-nct-delhi , Set-aside

Anderson Cooper 360

said in court. >> there is a quote in the congressional record in which your counsel -- your client said through counsel no former office holder is immune from investigation and prosecution. >> investigation is no issue. that may be true of subordinate officers, but as to the president, he is immune unless he is impeached. >> he was president at the time, and his position was that no former office holder is immune. and, in fact, the argument was there is no need to vote for impeachment because we have this backstop, which is criminal prosecution. and it seems that many senators relied on that, voting to acquit. >> don't. >> yeah, look. so when i was arnold inspector's chief of staff 100 years ago. during the clinton impeachment, my former boss had an op-ed that said we don't need to impeach him. he could be tried when he's out of office.

Supreme-court , Prosecution , Quote , Investigation , Record , Office-holder , Counsel , Issue , Client , President , Argument , Fact

Anderson Cooper 360

for another day, and decide here there's just no question. >> the attorneys for trump argued something different after the, during the second impeachment after the insurrection. i want to play youou some of w t was said in court. >> there is a quote in the congressional record, in which your council, i'm sorry your client said through council, no former officeholder is immune from the destination and prosecution. >> investigation is what -- well, that may be true -- but as to the principal officer, the president, he is immune unless he is impeached and convicted. and again it comes back to. -- >> but he was the president at the time, and his position was that no former officeholder is immune. and in fact, the argument was there is no need to vote for an impeachment, because we have this backstop, this criminal prosecution, and it seems that many senators relied on that, to voting to acquit. >> it -- i mean look, it, i was -- chief of staff 100 years ago, right. in the clinton administration, during the clinton impeachment, my former boss had an op-ed that ran in the new york times that said, we don't need to

Supreme-court , Question , Trump , Something , Clinton-impeachment , Prosecution , Insurrection , To-ask , Investigation , Record , Officeholder , Council

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

that a person cannot be prosecuted for any crimes committed while in office unless that president was impeached by the house of representatives and convicted in a senate trial and removed from office. not one republican member of the united states senate believed that when they voted to acquit donald trump. >> donald trump is liable for everything he did while he was in office. as an ordinary citizen. unless that statute of limitations is around, for every day trump was in office it applies. he didn't get away in anything yet. we have a criminal justice system in this country. we have civil litigation. and former presidents are not immune from being accountable by either one. >> the senate vote to convict donald trump was 67 to 43, a

Donald-trump , Crimes , United-states-senate , Person , Office , Republican , Trial , Member , House-of-representatives , One , Everything , Citizen

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

george h. w. bush. judge karen henderson was appointed by president george h. w. bush in 1990. judge michelle childs was appointed by president biden in 2022. judge florence pan was appointed by president biden in 2022. tomorrow, they will hear the most important appeal of their lives. donald trump's lawyers insist that a president cannot be prosecuted for any crimes committed while in office unless that president was impeached by the house of representatives and convicted in a senate trial and removed from office. not one republican member of the united states senate believed that when they voted to acquit donald trump. >> donald trump is liable for everything he did while he was in office. as an ordinary citizen. unless that statute of limitations is around, he is liable for every day trump was in office.

Little-joe-biden , George-h-w- , Pan , Judge , Michelle-childs , Karen-henderson , Bush , 1990 , 2022-tomorrow , 2022 , Donald-trump , Crimes

Trump Immunity Appeal

through investigation of prosecution. >> investigation is no prosecution. that may be true of subordinate office, but as to the president, he is immune unless he is impeached and convicted. >> he was president at the time, and the position is that no present officeholder is immune, and in fact, the argument was that there is no need to vote for impeachment because we have this backstop which is criminal prosecution, and it seems that many senators rely than in voting to acquit. >> and that belies speculation, because the statement of, i think that the court lacks the ability to read into what motivated the senator's votes in the impeachment process -- >> i think that the question that judge henderson is asking you is that you took the position or your client did in the impeachment proceedings that there would be an option for criminal prosecution later, and it is in the congressional

President , Prosecution , Investigation , Subordinate-office , Argument , Impeachment , Fact , Position , Officeholder , Backstop , Need , Supreme-court

Inside Politics With Dana Bash

donald trump through his agents conceded before that he could be prosecuted later. the judges can think about that, but they really do have to analyze this on its own merits. but the issue is, this is a political process. impeachment is a political process. it has legal trappings, but it doesn't have anything to do with whether these legal proceedings going on now is separate, so you can't expect that someone will be impeached and convicted in the senate on the legal merits. it's a political thing. so that really to me is what the court is thinking about. they're just thinking that's a separate thing, double jeopardy is a legal issue, not a political issue, and we're going to decide what this clause means without thinking about that issue as he frames it. >> look, i covered that trial very closely. i talked to every single senator who took a vote, saelths. i heard that time and time again, the ones who voted to acquit. let's deal with this in the legal system, not in the political system. now this is obviously going to be tested in the court.

Donald-trump , Judges , Issue , Impeachment , Process , Merits , Agents , Thing , Doesn-t , Anything , Senate , Someone

Ana Cabrera Reports

>> and prosecution. >> well, that may be true subordinate officers, but the principle officer, the president is immune unless he's impeached and then it comes back to -- >> he was president at the time and his position was that no former office holder is immune. and in fact, the argument was there is no need to go for impeachment because we have this back stop, which is criminal prosecution, and it seems that many senators relied on that in voting to acquit. >> -- speculation, statement -- i think the court, i think lacks the ability to intuit what senator -- what motivated senators' votes in an impeachment process. >> the question that judge henderson is asking you was you took the position or your client did during the impeachment proceedings that there would be an option for criminal prosecution later and it is in the congressional record and i guess the question is what has

President , Criminal-prosecution , Position , Officers , Officer , Office-holder , Obama , Impeachment , Argument , Prosecution , Fact , Senators