Live Breaking News & Updates on Article One Authority|Page 7
Stay updated with breaking news from Article one authority. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
It but dont know. We cant prevent them from doing the terrible things they do, so lets not talk about the form of the payment when i think our real concern is that we dont like what iran does with money that it legally obtains. Additionally, my understanding is that this requires an immediate payment. As much as it might be counterintuitive, electronic wire payments to iran have taken months to complete while the cash option method terms of the settlement. Its not something we like to do but, again, we signed an agreement called the algiers accords and each president in terms of giving money back to iran which was legally their money has used the rules of the accords. President obamas not the first president to do that. As i pointed out before, both president reagan and president george h. W. Bush did it as well. It takes a long time to make a Wire Transfer to iran because u. S. Sanctions against iran are so powerful and so compreh ....
Technical question but upon real issues of policy and governance that effect the globe all the way around. It is those Accountability Measures that havent been test driven yet. Before the transition was announced. The accountability of icann such as it was depended upon essentially the u. S. Governments exercise of soft power. The persuasion behind the scenes, if you will so it wasnt an explicit control and secretary strickland is right about that, but nonetheless, it was implicit in many ways. Thats whats going away. That sortth soft power control and what is coming in instead set of accountability measure that is will lead to empowered community that has the ability to, essentially, that has been tested in suggesting that the need for testing arises. Im not flying alone out there. Thats what the i can board suggested earlier when the Community Suggested the so ....
I want to make a point here, and then move on to a broader one. Some years ago i went through an exercise of what is congress obligated to do under article iii . This has to go back to the 18 or do wonder a Federal District that were polished by congress and happened to read through all that debate and to begin to ask this question, but we are obligated to do is produce a Supreme Court of the United States. We could conceivably abolish all of the Federal Districts and the only thing left would be the Supreme Court and the own obligation we have there since it calls for a chief justice is to have a chief justice but we dont have to fund the building or its death. He could be at his own card table with his own c ....
I am ok with the president making a goodfaith belief. Im ok with that. I think the fact here is one of bad faith. The reason why the president s statement is relevant is not the political theater. It is a statement he says he was asked, and he said no. The Justice Department said, this cant happen. Suddenly, you lose up already. I think it is bad faith. We are in uncharted waters. You will find that theres not much written on the take care clause. That is why the separation of powers trumps the Immigration Law when it goes too far. These provisions grant discretion, but to grant the amount of discretion now is unconstitutional. I should add that the memo does not put that much weight on these supervision, but the doj did. They shifted position of these provisions to put more weight on it. There is discretion but it is within the take care clause, which we have to litigat ....
People can try to restrain executive spent you suggest then if that should happen why would an executive with such disrespect for the constitution today on an amended constitution from the Constitutional Convention . That is an excellent question. I would like to turn to mr. Turley. Hes had a chance to reflect upon the earlier statement of the situation that we are in, and where this goes. We need to look into the future and ask unanimous consent for the additional minute to ask each of the witnesses to tell us what does america look like in the next 25 years if we have executive upon executive builds upon this continual stretching or disregard of the constitutional restraint and a disrespect for article i . Start with mr. Turley and speeding you may answer the question as quickly as you can. I really have great trepidation of where were heading because we are creating a new system here, something that is not designed. ....