Stay updated with breaking news from Category female. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
thing. we have a women's category and a men's category for a reason. by putting male athleteses in the women's category, they are making a mockery of the women's category. step up and do this for all little girls, female athletes. sports can bring so much good. we have amazing athletes and coaches and are excited for today. >> carley: madisan, what is the ncaa rules now and what would you like them to be? >> i don't know the specifics they have in place, i would like to keep women's sports for female, plain and simple and how it should be for current and future athletes. >> carley: yeah, broad strokes of rules, ncaa do allow biological males to compete in sports dependent on their
category of unsurprising, the cnn debate last night. ron desantis and nikki haley having a perfect opportunity to not only talk policy and attack each other, but they could have taken an opportunity to go directly after donald trump for some of what you're talking about him. his inactions on january 6th, lies about the election and so much more. they did not. instead spending time over and over again just attacking each other. watch this. >> i have said it again, ron, stop lie. >> she said she never said it. of course, you're lying. >> ron's lying because ron's losing. >> i thought he lied a lot. nikki haley gives him a run for his money. >> sarah, as someone does not want to have donald trump win the primary and be re-elected, as a republican who would like
pass the torch. >> yeah, pablo, you have some distance from this in a way that certainly i do not. >> correct. >> i've never -- i've always seen john wooden as the epitome of coaching. maybe, you know, sir alex with man united, could put him in wooden's category for anybody following the premier league. you'd probably agree with me there. but the past couple years, i started to put saban in the wooden category. because for him to do what he did in this age of parody, i still -- i'd love to talk to him sometime, not about football but about management, leadership, and how he did it. it was really remarkable. >> yeah, joe, this is an incredibly difficult job, college football coach who happens to become the greatest of all time. you mentioned the age of parody. this feels like the end of an era.
>> i'd kill you. >> that's right. >> martha: scene from the hit show "yellowstone".some say that it is sort of calling out woke culture for labelling masculinity as toxic as some people criticize during a conversation on the joe rogan experience podcast, the two discussed the creator of the show and joe rogan discussed how social activists are dividing the country, they say, by vilifying gender norms. listen to this conversation. >> defund the police, toxic masculinity. >> that worked great. >> they're in the same category of things. seems silly to think that way. you need all of it, masculinity and femininity. >> there's these new words that are meant to keep one person from disagreeing with another
bradshaw questions, he is in a category of witness where it is appropriate for me to give what is called the self incriminating warning, is that correct? that is correct. warning, is that correct? that is correct- can _ warning, is that correct? that is correct- can i — warning, is that correct? that is correct. can i ask— warning, is that correct? that is correct. can i ask you _ warning, is that correct? that is correct. can i ask you first - warning, is that correct? that is correct. can i ask you first of. warning, is that correct? that is| correct. can i ask you first of all, ou are correct. can i ask you first of all, you are legally — correct. can i ask you first of all, you are legally represented - correct. can i ask you first of all, i you are legally represented today? yes, i am. 50 you are legally represented today? yes, i am. you are legally represented today? yes,iam. ,,,,_ you are legally represented today? yes,iam. , , ~ ., ., yes, i am. so you probably know that under our law. _ yes, i am. so you probably know that under our law. a _ yes, i am. so you probably know that under our law, a witness _ yes, i am. so you probably know that under our law, a witness at _ yes, i am. so you probably know that under our law, a witness at a - yes, i am. so you probably know that under our law, a witness at a public. under our law, a witness at a public inquiry has the right to decline to answer a question put to him, either by counsel to the inquiry or by any legal representative, orfor by counsel to the inquiry or by any legal representative, or for that matter by me, if there is a risk that the answer to that question would incriminate the witness. this legal principle is known in shorthand form as a privilege against self—incrimination. mr bradshaw, i have decided that it is appropriate that i remind you of
the waste category or business category. house republicans moving to possibly impeach alejandro mayorkas over the border. negotiators in the senate say they're making progress toward landing on a deal that includes doing more border security. do you think in the end the deal is going to be good enough for democrats? setting aside mayorkas for a second. >> i'm not exactly sure where they are. but let's remember that the president offered a deal to dramatically increase border security last october. my friends across the aisle refused to put it on the floor. i think there's room for these discussions and good compromise. if there's no good faith, it won't get done. >> do you think alejandro mayorkas has done a good job when it comes to managing the crisis at the border, congressman? >> extraordinarily difficult time. i think he's done the best he can. he needs a lot more resources. let's remember the system was dismantled under the previous administration. we need those hearing officers, we need hire border security. we need to put the system in
translating or at least we don't see it yet. >> and i think you combine that with the polling we talked about it is felt from the start of this like there is an incumbent in this race in former president trump. his numbers in the polls have been consistent and commanding and they haven't fluke quated much. his lead has been huge the whole time. the rest of the field has not been able to match and this catch up to that and part of that early on there is a lot of candidates a lot of people to choose from. even now as the field has winnowed, we still see that same lead that speaks to the hold, the support that former president trump still has in iowa among republicans. >> bret: you look at the weather forecast lynn, for some of the journalists like myself, not from here, you know, we're a little weak. but we look at these temperatures on monday in the minus, you know, category, does that effect the diehards that go to the schoolhouse or the firehouse? >> it's definitely cold right now.
bill clinton. bill clinton, he made adjustments after the first midterm and said things like the era of big government is over, the end of welfare as we know it. he didn't double down on going left. he moved more to the center and it served him pretty well doing that. i only see biden doubling down on nothing because there's not a single policy success that i see that he can run on. >> biden is in a real conundrum because there's not a single measure he can run on successfully. he's underwater in every polling category that you can think of whether it's the economy, immigration, you go through it and he's just not going to win on any single issue. most incumbent presidents can run as a referendum, saying you want four more years of what i've done for you. or let's finish the job together. he can't do that because nobody wants him to finish the job. those numbers are very good for him so the only choice he has right now is a choice between good and evil.
bill clinton, he made adjustment bill clis after the firstd said midterm and, you know, said things like the era t of bn government is over. the end of welfare as we know it. he didn't double dow welfare anm left. he moved more to the centerovor and ate to tit serve it served e well doing that. sionly see biden doublin bidengn on nothing because there's not a single policy succesngs that. >> i see that he can run on in . >> biden is a real a real conundrum because there's not that he canheret a run on successfully. he's underwater in every every'a category that you can think of, whether it's the economy, immigratioethen. you go through it. and he's just not going to win on any single issue. issue. and on top of that, you know, most incumbent presidents can run as a referendu sidents m saying thisyo is, you know, this is you want s four more years of what i've done for you or let's finish the job together. thosan't dh er.he cano that. nobody wants him to finish the job. in fact, those numbers are horrific for. s him. so the only choice he has right now is to make this a choicehoice between good ande and he's painting himself