Along with courting multinational corporations to return to X, of course, comes pressure to censor speech disfavored by the multinational corporate technocracy.
Let the american people believe that in fact it was. even though we point this out all the time. they had the laptop for a year and spent so much time debunking this. they knew at some point of would break. the story would get out. they knew it would happen. they are pre-bunking that with these big tech companies and they are primed and ready to censor. but they still asked the question and the fbi knew the answer, but said no comment. the integrity site had a twitter person confirmed in the missouri case. the attorney general eric schmitt said that big tech was warned repeatedly, that the misinformation campaign may be about joe or hunter biden. is that correct, sir? weekly meetings they were told to be ready for a hack and dump operation that will happen in october and involve hunter biden. how did they know? they were predicting the future. they knew because they had the laptop. what they told us initially
Circuit against the exposure of grand jury testimony once they receive it from prosecutors. in a filing monday afternoon, attorneys for mr. trump objecting to what as i say is usually a standard usually agreed upon agreement in the circuit. writing the government requests the court assume the role of censor and impose content based regulates on president trump s political speech that would forbid him from publicly discussing or disclosing all nonpublic documents produced by the government. jack smith s team pushed back writing the defendant instead proposed an order designed to allow him to try this case in the media rather than in the courtroom. to safe guard privacy and integrity of these proceedings, the court should enter the government proposed protective
Misinformation and disinformation is more truth. is not to suppress or censor the statements. no, i did not play water polo at cornell but if someone said that i did that is okay, especially as an elected official i m going to take more incoming and lies but i also platform to try to get my version of the facts and the truth after crete is really dangerous for the left and primarily the left and most on the right think if you say something will judge who says it and will judge the content but the folks on the left are really embracing this idea that this information has to be taken off social media because it is dangerous and to take those down and not allow americans to engage in the discourse that is necessary is defensive tour former government.
Disinformation is more truth. is not to suppress or censor the statements. no, i did not play water polo at cornell but if someone said that i did that is okay, especially as an elected official i m going to take more incoming and lies but i also platform to try to get my version of the facts and the truth after crete is really dangerous for the left and primarily the left and most on the right think if you say something will judge who says it and will judge the content but the folks on the left are really embracing this idea that this information has to be taken off social media because it is dangerous and to take those down and not allow americans to engage in the discourse that is necessary is defensive tour former government.
Misinformation and disinformation is more truth. is not to suppress or censor the statements. no, i did not play water polo at cornell but if someone said that i did that is okay, especially as an elected official i m going to take more incoming and lies but i also platform to try to get my version of the facts and the truth after crete is really dangerous for the left and primarily the left and most on the right think if you say something will judge who says it and will judge the content but the folks on the left are really embracing this idea that this information has to be taken off social media because it is dangerous and to take those down and not allow americans to engage in the discourse that is necessary is defensive tour former government.
And frankly it s not a complete or thorough or fair discussion about the constitution or our laws. charlie, if you thought that this was not going to be about politics, think again because it s clear from just skimming through this right now over the last couple minutes, the defense is intending on making politics front and center. again, i m going to read an excerpt from page 4. against this backdrop the government requests the court assume the role of censor and impose content-based regulations on president trump s political speech that would forbid him from publicly discussing or disclosing all non-public documents produced by the government including both purportedly and sensitive materials. again, they and in this document they make reference to thinly veiled comments by other political players talking about the indictment, and they are now making the argument that president trump s if this protective order was granted president trump s hands would be
Process and they passed a law..e now they should have gone the hard route. we had other issuesdeci in wisconsin, a34 decision, stinging rebuksikinge by the cho justice in that state. and now we know igw that big teh was being lied to by an fbi that, knew that hunter biden s laptop was very real, but they were warninning bigg big th in the these weekly meetings leading up to that election. you might be a victim of misinformation and it may be about joe or hunter biden that was pre bonking a storthat goty then got censor. is that a form of electio n interference? absolute a because we know one e six people who voted for chang joe biden in 2020 would have changed their vote had they known the hunter biden laptop had was true. e a different president in office right now. it would be donald trump, notat joe biden. think about what a difference that mad mfoe for the trajectorf this country. but i ll tell you whatin-law i. saw my father in law today. i saw him on the way to the plane. i saw him get off the plan sean: ie i think the whole world saw the whole world saw it.
On. this whole idea of the facebook file showing us the government was actually censoring the truth. censoring the truth as if we can t handle the truth, or as if their truth is the only truth. what do you think about that? well, look, i think this is the predominate form of censorship we ve seen in the last several years, trace. the government is using private companies like facebook to do, through the back door, what government could not do directly through the front door under the constitution, censor politically disfavored speech. the reality in this country is that, the path to truth, it runs through free speech and open debate. that is why we have a first amendment. i do not think we would have run into those, rushed into those vaccine mandates as quickly if we had been allowed to debate the facts in the open. so i think this is good learning. and the problem with our mistakes and our history is if we don t learn from them we commit far worse in the future. at least let this be a learning that the next time we run into a