Live Breaking News & Updates on Committee on human element
Stay updated with breaking news from Committee on human element. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
and that many others were members of hamas. but the report says the israeli government has yet to provide any "supporting evidence" that "a significant number" of unrwa employees are members of terrorist organisations. nonetheless, there is an extensive list of recommendations, although the committee said it believed unrwa is "irreplaceable and indispensable to palestinians' human and economic development." the review, supported by three nordic research institutes, was headed by the former french foreign minister, overall, the findings of the review are that unwra is in place of a very significant number of mechanisms and procedures to ensure compliance with the humanitarian principle of neutrality. actually, they probably have a more developed system than other organisations or agencies. there is always room for
chair of the home affairs select committee. what did you make of what you heard from the prime minister this morning, the news conference he gave on this flagship reminder scheme for his government? brute scheme for his government? we started to get a bit more information about what the plan is. obviously. — information about what the plan is. obviously, it is 10—12 weeks ahead before _ obviously, it is 10—12 weeks ahead before any— obviously, it is 10—12 weeks ahead before any flexible take off. the home _ before any flexible take off. the home affairs select committee as i was been _ home affairs select committee as i was been very concerned about the practicalities of this scheme and whether— practicalities of this scheme and whether it will actually deliver the numbers — whether it will actually deliver the numbers that the government seem to think it _ numbers that the government seem to think it will, _ numbers that the government seem to think it will, and also whether it will actually have that deterrent value _ will actually have that deterrent value that the government claim. we know the _ value that the government claim. we know the permanent secretary of the home _ know the permanent secretary of the home office would not sign this policy— home office would not sign this policy off, he had to get a ministerial direction because he wasn't — ministerial direction because he wasn't satisfied that it was value for money, — wasn't satisfied that it was value for money, that it would deliver on what _ for money, that it would deliver on what the _ for money, that it would deliver on what the government think it will. so that— what the government think it will. so that is— what the government think it will. so that is still to be decided and we need — so that is still to be decided and we need to see the evidence of whether— we need to see the evidence of whether the scheme works. you have them in front — whether the scheme works. you have them in front of— whether the scheme works. you have them in front of your _ whether the scheme works. you have them in front of your committee - them in front of your committee fairly regularly. the next time you see them, what would you be wanting to get out of them? we see them, what would you be wanting to get out of them?— to get out of them? we want to get more information _
A committee that is against homosexuality and same-sex marriage has urged President Nangolo Mbumba to assent to last year’s marriage amendment bill and spouse bills, and to...
retaliation and even arrest if trump gets back in the white house. donald trump seemed to confirm those fears last month, when he posted this on social media about the vice chair of the committee, former republican congressman liz cheney. "she should go to jail along with the rest of the on select committee." >> miles taylor and maria teresa kumar. miles, you updated your book and the title includes the line "a warning to save democracy from trumps revenge." do you think democrats who served on the january 6th committee have reason to fear serious legal retribution from trump? >> yes, absolutely. it really is genuinely donald trump's intent in a second term to launch investigations through the justice department against his enemies. his justice department is not going to do this in a way that feels immediately political and illegal. they are going to find ways to,
with the authority also understands that he or she is not above the law and to be quite honest, as you know, i was chair of the january 6 committee. there are a lot of things that came up in our review that caused me great pause. and so i think, anyone in the highest seat of power would give second thoughts to some of the things they do if they would understand that some of it -- some of what goes with this job could be lost if you do the wrong thing. 91 criminal charges. it is clear that something is wrong. something is amiss. and we have to at least address it. this is my way of addressing what most people assume already occurs. if you break the law, the same benefits should no longer apply.
produced high—quality work and i absolutely am passionate about making sure people understand what you produce. we are sitting here in this wonderful gallery, there was a protest not so long ago, people shutting the place down and you feel that has been detrimental to the cause? we've got to view this as a transition, we are not going to switch off this stuff in the most successful transition is the transition that everyone supports so that bit of it needs work. fine transition that everyone supports so that bit of it needs work.— that bit of it needs work. one of the former— that bit of it needs work. one of the former prime _ that bit of it needs work. one of the former prime ministers - that bit of it needs work. one of- the former prime ministers knocking around at the moment liz truss says the climate change committee is a business quango and is far too political, are doing work that no one else worries about. what do you say to that that the committee should not exist? liz say to that that the committee should not exist?— say to that that the committee should not exist? liz truss is the elected politician _
about talking about it at the moment which i find interesting, look out your window and you see we have had the wettest i8 your window and you see we have had the wettest 18 months ever in this country. the hottest year on record in the last 12 months. people around the world now changes happening but there is definitely a fear of talking about it in british politics at the moment. my biggest fear about standing back from my former role on the change committee is that i would not wish to see us reach a point where you get polarised politics around climate, the likes of which you find in the us or australia. i worry that might start to creep in if we leave this vacuum. that hasn't i'm glad to say quite crept in to build and i was around climate change but not far from that. you can see some people have been warming up to make some of the site must again. tlillie warming up to make some of the site must aaain. , warming up to make some of the site must again-— must again. one place where there was allotment _ must again. one place where there was allotment easier _ must again. one place where there was allotment easier than - must again. one place where there was allotment easier than for - must again. one place where there was allotment easier than for it - was allotment easier than for it where even the greens and government is in the scottish commiseration and just this week they have ditched one of their targets.— of their targets. scotland is i think a salutary _ of their targets. scotland is i think a salutary tale. - of their targets. scotland is i think a salutary tale. the - of their targets. scotland is i - think a salutary tale. the scottish government chose to choose an even
sentences for that person. and ultimately, it is up to the secret service whether they get it back. >> congressman, i think mr. chairman, this is a really important conversation and a critical piece of legislation because in legal circles and nonlegal circles alike and throughout cable news and in the papers, many folks have said and it is even in the washington post headline that michael referenced, that secret service could be a barrier to donald trump or anyone like him meeting consequences. as you well know, you were the ranking member of homeland security and the house, the committee. there are presidents in this country. the one michael cole went to best country club presidents. this idea that secret service is a barrier to accountability i think is not true. i wonder what you think.
that carried into this weekend. saturday, trump had to cancel his first rally since the trail -- trial began, citing bad weather. while this was happening in public, more was going wrong for trump behind the scenes. according to new filings, his presidential campaign committee and in march with $45 million on hand, significantly less than president biden's $85 million total. that deficit forced the ex- president kicked up his fundraising pace as his legal expense and -- legal expenses are draining millions. but this might not be his biggest concern. saturday, the republican controlled house voted to send over $60 billion to ukraine in a direct rebuke of trump, who, for years, has infected the gop with his pro-russian, anti- ukraine agenda.
of the government's climate change advisers, chris stark, who said rishi sunak had set back progress towards net—zero carbon emissions by delaying future changes. ms courtinho told laura kuenssberg on sunday on bbc2 that ministers had to strike the right balance. with me is our political correspondent, damian grammaticas. so this was her first big interview on the bbc, wasn't it?— so this was her first big interview on the bbc, wasn't it? yes, on the sunday talk _ on the bbc, wasn't it? yes, on the sunday talk shows. _ on the bbc, wasn't it? yes, on the sunday talk shows. and _ on the bbc, wasn't it? yes, on the sunday talk shows. and what - on the bbc, wasn't it? yes, on the sunday talk shows. and what she i on the bbc, wasn't it? yes, on the i sunday talk shows. and what she had to respond to was chris stark. he has been in thisjob to respond to was chris stark. he has been in this job for six years and he is the chief adviser to the government on climate change policy. he has a background in this, so he is a serious figure. it was his committee's original advice that led the government, it was theresa may, to set in law, 2050 is the date for the uk to be net zero emissions. and what chris stark was critical of was rishi sunak has been pushing back the interim steps, switching to petrol and diesel cars and gas boilers and that sort of thing. the question for claire coutinho was, are you weakening your targets and are you weakening your targets and are you weakening your targets and are you not going to hit them? itrailiere are you not going to hit them? where we have, are you not going to hit them? where we have. and — are you not going to hit them? where we have. and i _ are you not going to hit them? where we have, and i make _ are you not going to hit them? where we have, and i make no _ are you not going to hit them? where we have, and i make no apology- are you not going to hit them? where we have, and i make no apology for. we have, and i make no apology for this, _ we have, and i make no apology for this, where — we have, and i make no apology for