Stay updated with breaking news from Con grow gangts. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The attorney for heuermanns estranged wife will join us in moments. First to bryan llenas live outside that courthouse watching all of this unfold just moments ago in river head, new york. Hi, bryan. Hi, martha. What we just heard, the Suffolk County direct attorney ray tierney explain what happened. There was a 30minute delay. The two attorneys spoke with the judge and the preliminary conference hearing began, lasted 510 minutes. Rex heuermann in his black coat suit, khaki pants, staring ahead with no emotion as they discussed the fact that they have to begin the long process, weekslong process of turning over 13 years worth of evidence involving these three murders that hes accused of committing to the defense. That process is going to happen on a rolling basis. The d. A. Saying theres about eight gigabytes worth of evidence. None of the evidence that has begun to be turned over doesnt include the evidence that they removed from ....
Important discussions we have had this week. The Supreme Court has agreed now to consider former President Trumps claim of president ial immunity in his federal Election Interference case. We it will further delay a potential trial. The high court has scheduled arguments for april 22nd, and a final ruling might not come until months later at the end of the term in june. If the court ruled in favor of trump the special counsels charges would be dismissed. The u. S. Court of appeals unanimously ruled trump does not have absolute immunity. The Supreme Court does affirmed that, the delays still would push the start of the trial probably into the fall. Lets bring in former litigator and msnbc Legal Correspond ....
federal judge in louisiana. here s his exchange with republican congressman mike johnson on wednesday. the fbi made the social media platforms pull that information off the internet if it came from conservative sources. they did this under the guise that it was disinformation. can you, can you define what disinformation is? our focus is on malign, foreign disinformation; that is, foreign hostile actors who engage in mr. wray to use our social media platforms i have to stop you for time. that s not accurate. you need to read this court opinion, because you re in charge of enforcing it. paul: joining the panel, columnists dan henninger, kim strassel and bill mcgurn. so, bill, first, let s start with that exchange on disinformation. what do you make of the fbi director s answers? i think he answered very weakly. he came across as a man who either hadn t read the material as congressman johnson suggested, or he just didn t take the whole oversight proces ....
the ccp, but they ll barely return the phone calls coming from across town from these gop leaders. next week carrie is traveling to push his global climate framework that the green radicals are desperate to establish. of course it s all a sickening suck up and a complete humiliation for the united states ar china has not only been harassing our aircraft, international waters but also hacking our government s e-mails. this hack only was able to gain access to the unclassified side of u.s. systems. it did provide this women some insights leading into the secretary of state s visit. secretary of commerce, gina ra money dough who s also in this hack. she is planning to visit beijing in the coming months. laura: for doing her this favor of hacking e-mails they ve invited her with the parade of biden officials. it s a dream come true for xi and of course he has no intention of abiding by any kerry approved climate rolls. never. they will continue to do what is in its econ ....
that argument. there is some evidence to suggest that. any evidence to suggest the presidency was what they were focused on? there is some evidence of that. people saying we don t want jefferson davis to be elected president and one of the drafts of section three specifically mentioned the presidency and vice presidency. it wasn t the final inaction. it wasn t final but there was concern by some people about con federal insurrectionists ascendsing to the presidency. we didn t want to make a a history argument. the other side can come back and throw this counter evidence back in our face. we wanted to focus more on the text of the constitution. it was a compromise provision that was enacted in section three. let me ask you another question about the states because you have forcefully made an argument about the states not being able to enforce section three. so if we agree with you on that, what happens next? i thought you also wanted us to end the litigation ....