Live Breaking News & Updates on Gdp marcello couple brazil
Stay updated with breaking news from Gdp marcello couple brazil. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
now, you're watching china and north korea. and i ran stand with russia those are the allies that putin has question is, well, the western allies stand with ukraine. and if the pro-putin caucus in the us congress has their way than of course, we wouldn't. >> the bill is passed you saw 75% of the congress vote for aid how important is the nato alliance super important later is hugely important? your former boss, donald trump, was one of those people leading the charge for other countries to pay their fair share. >> but i've also heard him criticized for not really being committed to nato. do you have any concerns? i do. there are some americans are feeling as though to come home and just let the world and you go its own way. >> and i think he was responding to that sentiment in some cases this says he did push them to pony up and get into the two 2% of gdp in most of them are working towards that back here in america, there are also critics who argue president biden's afghanistan withdrawal all in
you're watching china and north korea. and i ran stand with russia those are the allies that putin has. the question is, what? the western allies stand with ukraine? and if the pro-putin caucus in the us congress has their way than of course, you wouldn't. >> the bill is passed you saw 75% of the congress vote for aid how important is the nato alliance super important later is hugely important. your former boss, donald trump, was one of those people leading the charge for other countries to pay their fair share there. >> but i've also heard him criticized for not really being committed to nato. do you have any concerns? i do. >> there are some americans and feel as though to come home and just let the world just go its own way. and i think he was responding to that sentiment in some cases, but he did push them to pony up and get into the two percentage gdp in most of them are working towards is that accurate american, there are also critics who argued president biden's afghanistan
is set to overtake apple to become the world's second most valuable company. tell us more about that. >> indeed. nvidia is adopting ai applications including openai chat's gdp. nvidia stock has surged more than six-fold since the beginning of last year, reaching the value of almost 2.8 trill yn dollars. that means it's worth more than amazon and alphabet and could soon leapfrog apple and microsoft. nvidia's successful run could continue as well because this week it announced the next generation of its processors. in a sur prove move just three momtss after the last launch. so certainly you have to watch this one. >> we will indeed. cnbc's charlotte reed live from london. thanks as always. next up, the campaign and
struggle. they save. to send their children to a private school. ijust think it's completely misguided. it is just such think it's completely misguided. it isjust such an think it's completely misguided. it is just such an easy win for the labour party to sort of cash rich people when that is not the case at all. . ~ people when that is not the case at all. ., ,, , ., people when that is not the case at all. ., ,, i. _ people when that is not the case at all. ., _ , people when that is not the case at all. ., ,, i. _ , .,, ., all. thank you, lucy will stop -- to bash rich people. _ all. thank you, lucy will stop -- to bash rich people. tessa, _ all. thank you, lucy will stop -- to bash rich people. tessa, what - all. thank you, lucy will stop -- to i bash rich people. tessa, what should they be talking about? i bash rich people. tessa, what should they be talking about?— they be talking about? i would like to see the nhs, _ they be talking about? i would like to see the nhs, the _ they be talking about? i would like to see the nhs, the police, - they be talking about? i would like to see the nhs, the police, and i they be talking about? i would like| to see the nhs, the police, and the education _ to see the nhs, the police, and the education services ring fenced from standard _ education services ring fenced from standard politics. iwould education services ring fenced from standard politics. i would like to see an _ standard politics. i would like to see an agreed amount, a percentage of our— see an agreed amount, a percentage of our gdp _ see an agreed amount, a percentage of our gdp invested into each of those _ of our gdp invested into each of those public services, so that the politicians — those public services, so that the politicians can't constantly use that as — politicians can't constantly use that as the hot potato to centre their— that as the hot potato to centre their policies around and their vote winning _ their policies around and their vote winning around. i think if you have an agreed — winning around. i think if you have an agreed investment that is only allowed _ an agreed investment that is only allowed to be changed by agreement by all parties, in the event of a covid _ by all parties, in the event of a covid pandemic or something that
the submarine building programme for the submarine building programme for the new dreadnoughts. that has added hundreds of millions of cost and also put extra pressure on the current cruise. == also put extra pressure on the current cruise.— also put extra pressure on the current cruise. hannah, you are in the north west of england, greater manchester whether labour leader is campaigning, tell me a bit more about how this message is expected to go down with key labour supporters? brute is expected to go down with key labour supporters?— is expected to go down with key labour supporters? we are expecting to hear from — labour supporters? we are expecting to hear from the _ labour supporters? we are expecting to hear from the labour— labour supporters? we are expecting to hear from the labour leader - labour supporters? we are expecting to hear from the labour leader here | to hearfrom the labour leader here in greater manchester in the next half hour or so, talking about his plans and his commitment to spend 2.5% of gdp on defence. that is a pledge that they have said they will do as soon as resources allow. there is a difference with the conservative party insofar so far as rishi sunak has said that he will reach that level of funding
without a time frame? we must increase defence spending to deal with the increasing threats we face. but by when? we'll undertake a defence review within the first year, where we'll look at the threats we face, the capabilities we need, and we will set the plan to hit 2.5% as part of that review. labour look and sound very different on defence than they did. the question for you is how that might change your view of them, or not. chris mason, bbc news, in bury. sir keir used his speech to recommit labour to boosting uk defence spending to 2.5% of gdp — without setting a deadline. prime minister rishi sunak has vowed to hit the target by 2030 if re—elected. lets get the view of the security and intelligence industry. justin crump served in the british armed forces, he is the ceo and founder of sybilline. always good to see you. thank you
this manufacturing numbers which kind of week this morning's piece we really quickly, how do you like the market as we go in june here. -- crypto didn't go away, but -- what dc happening now? >> i'm starting to worry a little bit because when you look at the invasion numbers there rounded moving harder. we have three -- executive months now when a month over month cpi figures meet expectations to the outside. that is not good news for consumers. lec numbers like the gdp lower then the previous quarter and a manufacturing supply manager survey that i just mentioned. that is a slight snip of stagflation which is not just a mark -- markets. markets are spotted with an outside yet but markets are a little bit slow because they have a natural upward bias because of long -- only mutual funds and retirement plan that always by stocks. some little worried about us being a little bit copy here but is simply no time to panic.
you can't build a frigate in a year. to stand next to m military veterans, but the numbers it's all about the numbers. why do labour not commit to it the conservatives to two... br; commit to it the conservatives to two... r, ::;~, 1: commit to it the conservatives to two... �*, ::;~,:: ., commit to it the conservatives to two... j ::;~,::'~ ., . ., . two... by 2030? today's announcement was all about _ two... by 2030? today's announcement was all about positioning, _ two... by 2030? today's announcement was all about positioning, new - was all about positioning, new triple — was all about positioning, new triple lock— was all about positioning, new triple lock sound _ was all about positioning, new triple lock sound like - was all about positioning, new triple lock sound like it - was all about positioning, new triple lock sound like it means| triple lock sound like it means something _ triple lock sound like it means something but _ triple lock sound like it means something but it _ triple lock sound like it means something but it doesn't i triple lock sound like it means| something but it doesn't mean anything — something but it doesn't mean anything at _ something but it doesn't mean anything at all. _ something but it doesn't mean anything at all, we _ something but it doesn't mean anything at all, we are - something but it doesn't mean i anything at all, we are committed something but it doesn't mean - anything at all, we are committed to maintaining — anything at all, we are committed to maintaining britain's— anything at all, we are committed to maintaining britain's nuclear- maintaining britain's nuclear deterrent— maintaining britain's nuclear deterrent which— maintaining britain's nuclear deterrent which we - maintaining britain's nuclear deterrent which we do - maintaining britain's nuclear. deterrent which we do anyway. maintaining britain's nuclear- deterrent which we do anyway. the men standing — deterrent which we do anyway. the men standing around _ deterrent which we do anyway. the men standing around military- deterrent which we do anyway. the i men standing around military figures trying _ men standing around military figures trying to— men standing around military figures trying to tell — men standing around military figures trying to tell the _ men standing around military figures trying to tell the product _ men standing around military figures trying to tell the product that - men standing around military figures trying to tell the product that the i trying to tell the product that the labour— trying to tell the product that the labour party— trying to tell the product that the labour party has _ trying to tell the product that the labour party has changed, - trying to tell the product that the labour party has changed, that l trying to tell the product that the| labour party has changed, that is trying to tell the product that the i labour party has changed, that is no longer— labour party has changed, that is no longer the _ labour party has changed, that is no longer the labour— labour party has changed, that is no longer the labour party— labour party has changed, that is no longer the labour party of— labour party has changed, that is no longer the labour party ofjeremy i longer the labour party ofjeremy corbyn _ longer the labour party ofjeremy corbyn who— longer the labour party ofjeremy corbyn who was _ longer the labour party ofjeremy corbyn who was much _ longer the labour party ofjeremy corbyn who was much more - longer the labour party ofjeremy i corbyn who was much more equivocal on the _ corbyn who was much more equivocal on the stuff, — corbyn who was much more equivocal on the stuff, but _ corbyn who was much more equivocal on the stuff, but you're _ corbyn who was much more equivocal on the stuff, but you're right, - corbyn who was much more equivocal on the stuff, but you're right, the i on the stuff, but you're right, the key policy— on the stuff, but you're right, the key policy thing _ on the stuff, but you're right, the key policy thing is _ on the stuff, but you're right, the key policy thing is this _ on the stuff, but you're right, the key policy thing is this 2.5% - on the stuff, but you're right, the key policy thing is this 2.5% gdpi key policy thing is this 2.5% gdp commitment _ key policy thing is this 2.5% gdp commitment and _ key policy thing is this 2.5% gdp commitment and labour- key policy thing is this 2.5% gdp commitment and labour has i key policy thing is this 2.5% gdp commitment and labour has not key policy thing is this 2.5% gdp i commitment and labour has not gone as far— commitment and labour has not gone as far as— commitment and labour has not gone as far as the _ commitment and labour has not gone as far as the tories _ commitment and labour has not gone as far as the tories is _ commitment and labour has not gone as far as the tories is to _ commitment and labour has not gone as far as the tories is to set _ commitment and labour has not gone as far as the tories is to set a - as far as the tories is to set a date when _ as far as the tories is to set a date when they— as far as the tories is to set a date when they will— as far as the tories is to set a date when they will hit - as far as the tories is to set a date when they will hit that, i as far as the tories is to set a i date when they will hit that, the lid reason — date when they will hit that, the lid reason for— date when they will hit that, the lid reason for that _ date when they will hit that, the lid reason for that is _ date when they will hit that, the lid reason for that is that - date when they will hit that, the lid reason for that is that labour assumed — lid reason for that is that labour assumed that _ lid reason for that is that labour assumed that if _ lid reason for that is that labour assumed that if they— lid reason for that is that labour assumed that if they do - lid reason for that is that labour assumed that if they do commit| lid reason for that is that labour. assumed that if they do commit to
the uk's nuclear weapons. among them, the man who could be could be foreign secretary next month, david lammy . the woman who could be deputy prime minister, angela rayner. and the shadow minister for international development lisa nandy. others abstained. former defence secretary ben wallace has suggested that both labour and conservative governments are responsible for "hollowing out" british defenc. and he told radio it's "the world at one" that the incoming government should spend even more than they have currently pledged: than they have currently pledged. the threat is rising toward the end of the decade, but i would suggest, as others have, that towards the end of the decade we should be spending 3% of gdp. however, to get there, you have to follow a progressive line. you can'tjust do of dollars or pounds to a you can'tjust dollop millions of dollars or pounds to a department, whatever�*s spending.
wasn't things of real substance. i actually think o'brien is a brilliant friend of mine and he has this theory that i agree with, diversity, equity and inclusion is the only way to america, gdp is going to grow in the future because there's not enough college educated white men right now to sustain current gdp so you will have to teach black people and brown people different skill set and have to teach them financial literacy and how to empower themselves just to continue. we can't act like america is not a country of immigrants. >> you have a chance to scholarship into charter schools, argument in support? are you surprised democrats are not? >> i did know they were against it.