Stay updated with breaking news from Gore guggenheim. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
in to south to destroy the klaiklan, that changed. later they would try to work it out. it is is amazing, nobody was indicted, nobody was charged with anything. it is justin credible. we have election of 2000, al gore, and george w. bush it came down to florida, a couple hundred red votes, al gore brings first lawsuit it is then litigation hell, different districts in the state, and trying to find judges that would up hold this part of law the that part of the law, the radical left wing democrat control florida supreme court steps and changes the law, to try to get gore over the finish line, u.s. supreme court says that is enough. that is enough. the voting has to stop.
in to south to destroy the klaiklan, that changed. later they would try to work it out. it is is amazing, nobody was indicted, nobody was charged with anything. it is justin credible. we have election of 2000, al gore, and george w. bush it came down to florida, a couple hundred red votes, al gore brings first lawsuit it is then litigation hell, different districts in the state, and trying to find judges that would up hold this part of law the that part of the law, the radical left wing democrat control florida supreme court steps and changes the law, to try to get gore over the finish line, u.s. supreme court says that is enough. that is enough. the voting has to stop.
what trump did. they didn't try to overturn an election. al gore conceded, in fact allegory was the sitting vice president who counted george w. bush editorial college votes and didn't do what trump falsely says mike pence was about to do. hillary clinton -- house senate democrats voted to object to some states votes counts in january 21 and january 2017, but not as part of a plot to overturn the election, not with the aid of fake electors, and not at all gore and hillary clinton's direction. republicans are gaslighting you when they say democrats did the same. of course they didn't. what donald trump did in terms of trying to overrule the votes in georgia or trying to get the doj to make false claims of voter fraud and trying to get mike pence to throw out votes and trying to submit fake electors, no president, no party has ever done before. what trump did is what he is being prosecuted, for not for what he said. and that they keep coming up with one ludicrous dishonest, demonstrably false argument after another is evidence that they know that this time,
allegory was the sitting vice president who counted george w. bush editorial college votes and didn't do what trump falsely says mike pence was about to do. hillary clinton -- house senate democrats voted to object to some states votes counts in january 21 and january 2017, but not as part of a plot to overturn the election, not with the aid of fake electors, and not at all gore and hillary clinton's direction. republicans are gaslighting you when they say democrats did the same. of course they didn't. what donald trump did in terms of trying to overrule the votes in georgia or trying to get the doj to make false claims of voter fraud and trying to get mike pence to throw out votes and trying to submit fake electors, no president, no party has ever done before. what trump did is what he is being prosecuted, for not for what he said. and that they keep coming up with one ludicrous dishonest, demonstrably false argument after another is evidence that they know that this time, finally, he is in serious legal
george h. w. bush thinking the same thing. wait? they are rejecting me? i can't believe it. but to most extreme examples, richard nixon. who conceded a race when a lot of people around him in 1960 were saying, they stole illinois from you. he said that it didn't matter. i'll gore, one of the few good moments of his 2000 campaign where we saw into the heart of our core. was, for him, tragically his concessions speech. any concessions speech, one of the most patriotic concession speeches. when al gore knew that five republican appointees to the, nominees to the supreme court voted against him and for democratic appointees voted for him, he still went now gave and
but gore conceded within a week, maybe ten days. >> so why is.com county saying what he's saying then? >> because you saw the president's remarks after the indictment yesterday. he's angry . you're still going to win the primary. and he's going to want to give himself a pardon. he's all in. guns are all blazing. i'm sure that in his remarks to kevin, better stick up for me. and kevin is certainly playing that role and showed that anger last night. >> i mentioned earlier that you were one of ten republicans in
that this is basically criminalizing the type of speech and type of things that perhaps al gore said after the 2000 election when he lost the election in 2004. you were there. someone who worked on the recount for george w. bush, and what do you say about this comparison? >> it is no comparison at all. i spent 33 wonderful days in florida after the election. i think that what gore did was a mistake. it was wrong on his part. every recount of that election has shown that bush won, but what gore did was to follow the lawful procedures in florida to commence a recount, and to engage in litigation in the florida courts. he was ultimately defeated across the board, and he ultimately did concede, but the whole process showed although i
it's a morass, it's awful. when you think about what's happened. >> laura: it's a carousel of prosecutions. i'm going to say that it will never end. when republicans get the justice department, the republican president is in. there is going to be a lot of people out there that gore their oxes i'm not saying that would be right but can you see where this will go. >> they will say line -- they are going after trump's subordinates. how about, comey, brenner and mccabe destruction of evidence? how about emails and devices that hillary destroyed? they are going after election denialism, how about the 2004 election? how about stacey abrams? how about hillary saying that the trump was not legitimate? how about the collusion hoax that tried so subvert an election? how about the disinformation? they can for every tit there is a tat. and if they get in power, the democrats should understand that they are establishing standards or lack of standards that are