Stay updated with breaking news from Governance agenda. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
cuts in unprotected areas and they will have to take the can for that. what i would say is that a real nerves in the shadow cabinet at the moment about what happens after the election. you talk to them, and privately they say, of course we are going to win the election, of course we are going to have to majority but we're not saying that because we cannot be complacent. what they are worried about is not so much they don't have the plan. there is so great who is getting them ready, —— sue grey. what they are worried about is the not ready politically for what they are going to do. the big concerns in the rachel reeves circle at the moment. what is going to the of her chancellor issue? it was going to be... they are really nervous and not have heard enough politically for that governance for a day one. it politically for that governance for a da one. . . politically for that governance for ada one. , . , ,
>> yes. >> if you look at what everyone was saying, it was bipartisan support about that support to ukraine was not just specifically for that country, but it's about making sure that we can protect our allies. and if you look at how i wrote on china and russia have come together to basically try to form an alliance against a us, giving the support to ukraine, which is much needed, was so important. and the president to me got away with not too much damage done with this party because you saw democrats joined the speaker and the republic get this done. so now we've got to continue to make sure that voters understand that this is a one day in washington, what al come back on a weekend where you can actually see governance at its best. >> you agree with that political win for the president? >> what it's i. think it's a political win for america. there are many democrats and obviously many republicans. i was again, obviously not all of them is the divide within the party, but many republicans support what happened and what we saw yesterday was that the will of the house was heard and
said it would be quick and immediate and swift. >> okay. priscilla alvarez. thank you so much. of course. we've heard some response coming from the house speaker there and georgia rep. marjorie taylor taylor greene, a real contrast within the republican party. join me right now, congresswoman jasmine crockett, she is a democrat from texas congresswoman. great to see you. >> okay. we heard real contrasting views on how to see the passage of these for foreign aid bills today from the house speaker as it pertains to ukraine, he says provides for greater accountability, better outcome of the war, and there's that loan aspect contrasting that with marjorie taylor greene who says this is a sellout of america. where do you stand on this well, let's take issue with things that both of them said, i do want to applaud the speaker for finally waking up and deciding that he wanted to stand on the sayyed of governance instead of obstruction. >> and he said that this aid is timely. it is not timely by any stretch of the imagination.
that includes artillery rounds, air defence missiles, as well as financial assistance for the ukrainian governance. that financial assistance has been converted into a loan. in the initial bill that was first admitted by president biden exactly six months ago today. that gives you an idea just how long this legislation has been stalled in congress. when it was admitted, it was part of the package and the financial assistance part was basically a hand—out to the ukrainians. but that has now been transferred into a loan. the ukrainians perhaps wonder how to pay that back. that is a bit of a concession to hardline republicans, conservative republicans in congress, many of them are very sceptical about funding ukraine, sending assistance to ukraine. they are part of the growing isolationist wing of the republican party. many of them think that more money should
this is one of those themes that he finally had to settle in realize that there's actually more support for ukraine than he thought he could have actually passed every single piece of legislation on a suspension. he didn't even have to go through rules. that's how much bipartisan support existed. now, honestly, we know that the democrats per the usual, are the ones that held it down. but marjorie taylor greene saying that we need to fund the border, will she needs to go? we'll talk to her master, aka donald trump, who specifically said, do not go through with the border bill. and that's the only reason they don't have anything. so if she has a problem, she needs to go talk to donald instead of blaming her speaker. and also, she's talking really big talk about how she believes in governance. and so that's what she wants to be responsible because she cares about the institution. she didn't care about the institution on january 6 or even after january 6, as she continues to support those that we're trying to tear us down.
Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has confirmed Tauranga City Council will return to fully elected governance in July despite requests for continued...
There is no link between an Italian government amendment allowing pro-life activists access to abortion clinics and a decree enacting the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) it is contained in, the European Commission said Friday. (ANSA)
kowtowing to that faction. look, seeing the rise of a kind of coalition arrangement in the house is good for the united states of america. it's good for this country when we have bipartisan legislation that protects american allies and protects american national security. this is one of those no-brainer pieces of legislation in many ways that was being held up by some of the weirdest, wildest, craziest, and almost you hate to call them arguments, in american public life. just wild propaganda was holding up this aid. i think at long last, he realized he's not really speaker of the house, not really, if he is beholden to marjorie taylor greene. so this is where he decides he has to be speaker of the house if he is going to hold that position. marjorie taylor greene, if she's going to take him on, let her do her worst. i think this was not just an important moment for ukraine, for israel, for taiwan, it was a very important moment for american governance. i've known mike johnson for many
courts, they have taken the position that nothing, and i'm not just saying this about juan mershon certainly the case in washington is also a gag order, they have taken the position there is nothing more important in this society than the administration of justice in their little trials. i don't mean to poke fun at it so much as to say you know, there is a lot of interest in american governance that are more important than the outcome of any trial no matter how important the trial seems. like having a presidential campaign, where people who are competing for the most important office on the planet are able to speak robustly which is what is in the public interest. the courts don't think they have to seed any ground to that. even though it is very common in constitutional law when important public interests