the durham investigation is all about. at least the beginnings of that, but that has also now become officially a criminal probe that has expanded into all thingsgs fisa and other things, and according to my sources tonight, while the ig will confirm a ton of damning information, devastating information on the doj, the fbi, the fisa applications, apparently there has been some disagreement, a little unwillingness of the obama-appointed inspector general to take the needed steps to say one and one equals two. well, in other words, to bluntly say what it is. and by the way, behind the scenes, i am told there has been a brutal back and forth, you can add simple math, right? apparently that line has been used numerous times. the attorney general reportedly believes that there was not sufficient basis. and this is where the durham report comes into open an investigation into the trump campaign in 2016. horowitz allegedly expected to deliver a much different finding on that. although that was not his early mandate. his mandate was to look into fisa abuse. this would explain the delay, after delay, after delay, and also the recent leaking that has been going on, which has been rampant. assuming this is true, if the obama-appointed horowitz does not conclude on the basic issues that we all know to be established fact, premeditated fraud on the fisa court, repeatedly. at the end of the day, the ag is signaling that the durham repor, is where all of the action will be on everything. and we do need to remember a couple of important facts here. remember the inspector general has no power to convene a grand jury. has no power to bringg indictments. has no power to bring charges. durham does have all of that power. and remember that this is now officially a criminal investigation that has expanded into many of the issues thats will be in next week s report. and again, i hear it is very damning, just reading the factsr also, another important thing to remember, horwitz already concluded both mccabe and comey lied. that they lacked candor. by the way, that was something that was a big deal when it was a trump associate. and by the way, in those two cases, nothing happened. remember? he made referrals, nothing happened. the ig does not make criminal referrals. he makes referrals to investigate. funny, because candor got michael cohen, paul manafort, more recently, roger stone in tons of trouble. the system is so corrupt, frankly, repulsive, we have aa dual justice system in this country. and also, don t forget, this is what the attorney general signaled in a recent speech. i would argue that no attorney general of the united states would say this unless you know something we don t know. take a listen. immediately after president trump won election, opponents inaugurated what they called the resistance. and they rallied around an explicit strategy of using every tool and maneuver to sabotage the functioning of the executive branch and his administration. now, resistance is the language used to describe insurgency against rule imposed by an occupying military power. this is a very dangerous and, indeed, incendiary notion to import into the politics of the democratic republic. sean: i would buckle up as a country, that sounds as serious as it can get. much more on that straight ahead. lindsey graham, remember, a week from this wednesday, he s will have horowitz before his committee in the senate andd he will respond exclusively to this developing story tonight. first, also buckle up, the month of december is about to be one of the most pivotal times in modern american history. look at this, as we speak, house democrats, they have been on this quest for three years, racing against the clock, because they want to wrap up their half-assed impeachment ukraine coup attempt charades by christmas. and many deep state bureaucrats are anxiously waiting the findings of a real investment into corruption and the very of real abuse of power.gs the horowitz fisa report will be public one week from tonight, and now all of a sudden, softball interview appears at the daily beast. they love me at that paper. the once-disgraced former fbi attorney lisa page painting herself as an innocent victim just trying to fight back against the president s unfounded attacks.pa let me educate the so-called journalists in the mob and the media. lisa page is neither innocent nor a victim. she carried out what was a lengthy affair with the top investigator at the fbi named peter strzok. their personal business is their business. but the two of them inserted their rampant political bias, yes, into highly sensitive top-notch investigations including the probe into hillary clinton s secret server. by the way, if you want real obstruction, that would be the bleach bit, the deleted subpoenaed emails, et cetera. again, the collusion on the campaign against trump, the dossier. remember they were using their work phones and why robert mueller did not demand that they be handed over and we do a search of all of it is anybody s understanding. anyway, her and strzok were obsessing about their hatred for all things donald trump. remember, the spring of 2016,ng page texting that trump was a loathsome human being referring to him as a giant [bleep]. peter strzok, agreed, texting, trump is an idiot. hillary clinton should win 100/0. smelly trump walmart voters. over the texts unhinged, theen agent bonding over compulsive hatred for donald trump, the plot to stop him from ever becoming president. and on august 8th, only eight days after jim comey opened his counterintelligence investigation into the trump campaign, after i would argue they gave hillary considerations that no american would ever get, lisa page sent this desperate to text to her best friend, her bff lover. trump is not ever going to become president, right? strzok texts back, no, no, he s not, we will stop it. a few days later, stzrok telling page that, i want to show the path that you throughout and consideration in andy s office that there is no way that he gets elected. i m afraid we cannot take that risk. it is like an insurance policy in the unlikely event that you die before your 40. we will stop him. insurance policy. those are not texts between two low level employees in the federal government. those were two of the most powerful individuals working at the highest levels of the fbi and involved in the rigged investigation into hillary clinton. a massive corruption scandal in itself. in fact, strzok was the lead investigator in the clinton email probe, remember that he is interrogating hillary clinton, but she gets to bring two other people involved in the case for support. nobody else gets that consideration.ri and by the way, remember, they changed the words, yeah, to not be the legal standard. anyway, also leading the counter intel investigation, operation cross-fire hurricane into the trump campaign only days after they exonerated their favorite candidate that should win 100/0. lisa page was the close adviser to the director of the fbi andrew mccabe. august 2016, the pair was discussing ways to use an those powerful positions to stop stnald trump, upend his presidency with their insurance policy at the ready in the unlikely event that trump beat their favorite candidate, hillary clinton. and it was all done in an official capacity using their work phones. lisa page is not a victim. she resigned in disgrace. her lover, peter strzok, fired by the fbi along with all of these other guys, fired, resigning, demoted.. and mueller s former pit bull, andrew weissmann, a long history of locking up innocent people, prosecutorial abuse, hiding exculpatory evidence. you want the proof, read sidney powell s book license to lie. sticking up for his trump hater saying she did nothing wrong. shocking, the deep state, they support each other. lisa page has done nothing wrong. she has a first amendment right to speak, even as a federal employee.. and it is just a fiction to think that jurors, judges, federal employees do not have political views. the issue is whether they act on them. people act on principle all the time. jurors do it, judges do it, federal prosecutors do it. and it is simply not the case to think that personal views are going to affect what a prosecutor does. sean: pretty amazing, he works at msdnc, the conspiracy theory channel. amazing how weissmann has turned into the great defender of civil liberties after leading a baseless witch hunt into president trump. as you can see, clearly, the deep state is in panic mode ahead of not only the fisa report, but the durham criminal investigation, and it now all begins to make sense. the timing of page s interview is not a coincidence. neither is the person who interviewed her. foxnews.com, they point out page used an abusively biased trump-hating writer to break her silence ahead of the ig report.t no softball interview is ever going to cover up distorted actions, the revealing political bias in her texts with peter strzok. as sara carter put it, her actions damaged the fbi and the image of this country. here with more fox news investigative reporter sara carter, okay, i want you to comment on this. we just had this other breaking news, which explains a lot. first of all, durham was appointed, this is important for everybody to know, for the purpose of looking into the origins of the russian witch hunt. so that is separate and apart from what horowitz s mandate was. so whatever that disagreement on that does not matter that much to me. premeditated fraud on the fisa court, though, the evidence is incontrovertible at this point. absolutely, sean, people need to realize that durham has so much more leeway. he has a much wider scope than horowitz had. this is why he has been traveling overseas and traveled to italy to speak with italian intelligence officials as well as to london. he has a much wider scope.to he is able to subpoena more documents and able to subpoena people to come in to testify.o and able to impanel a the grand jury. obviously, john durham has found something so significant that it shifted from an administrative review to an actual criminal probe. this is what is so important here. horowitz is going to have a devastating report. and this is the reason why, sean, people like lisa page, former fbi lawyer, kevin kleinsmith as well, as well as people like peter strzok, james comey, john brennan, and others have come out of the woodwork now, because they are trying to change the narrative. what they are trying to do is control the narrative, because they know within a week, we, the public are going to see this report and it is going to be extremely damning. sean: all right, sara, thank you very much for that report. now we will have more on the upcoming fisa abuse released one week from today, lindsey graham will join us exclusively. but first i have to issue a warning, once again lead the american people will be forced to endure another week of the democrats mind-numbing impeachment, well, ukrainian impeachment coup charade. more of the schiff show, and what is one of the worst relay races ever, that corrupt congenital liar schiff just passed the baton. the circus goes into judiciary chairman jerry nadler s realm, if you will.ea sprinting to get this across the finish line before christmas. it is a sight for sore eyes,in total sham, blatant political stunt, case in point, the first official impeachment proceedings scheduled while the president is overseas.oi he won t even be in the country to defend himself. in a scathing beat down, the white house counsel, pat cipollone telling democrats, you scheduled this initial hearing no doubt purposely during the time that you know the president will be out of the country attending the nato leaders meeting in london. as you know, this baseless and highly partisan inquiry violates all past historical precedent, fact.gh basic due process rights, fact. fundamental fairness, fact. we understand from rumors and press reports, not from anyy notice provided in your letter or notice of the hearing, that the hearing will consist of an academic discussion of law professors. we understand this to mean that your initial hearing will include no fact witnesses at all. that is just like the schiff show. we have opinion people. we have hearsay people. we have one fact witness that said, i don t want a quid pro quo, what do you want from ukraine? nothing at all. we will get random left-wing academics lecturing all of us on the virtues of hating trump impeachment. is this an actual proceeding or just a tabloid morton downey, jerry springer tv talk show?y, here with the full report, capitol hill senior producer chad pergram is with us. okay, so we are going to have a talk show? i wonder if they will be throwing chairs, the academics that are offering their opinions on impeachment. i wonder if alan dershowitz will be invited, chad? sean, impeachment it is getting real on capitol hill. just tonight, the intelligence committee democrats completed their version of the impeachment report. impeachment falls under the jurisdiction of the judiciary committee. this report could serve as a basis to write articles of impeachment. members can review the report now. but they will notle publish the report until at this time tomorrow night. republicans are not buying thehe democratic report, republicanshi preemptively published a a pre-buttal today. republicans argue that novembers hearings produced no evidence of an impeachable offense. republicans contend democrats based their allegations on hearsay and speculation.el the house intelligence chairman adam schiff shot back that the g.o.p. report was intended for an audience of one and ignores what he termed voluminous evidence of alleged misdeeds. the judiciary committee impeachment hearing is wednesday, the white house saidr they will not participate. but today i asked a senior administration source that officials may try to work out and in between or half measure. i was told, stay tuned. republicans want schiff to testify at the hearing, but instead, the hearing features four law professors. it s unclear when democrats could actually try to impeach the president. democrats just today announced the house will remain in session almost until christmas. the house voted to impeach president clinton on thent saturday before christmas in 1998, but do democrats have the votes for impeachment? house speaker nancy pelosi is a master at reading her caucus. if pelosi has the votes, she will move to impeachment. if she does not, impeachment could wait until the new year. a member of the leadership team told fox that the backlog of bills in the house works against a december impeachment vote and the democrat noted that the impeachment does not fit in the holiday spirit. sean, back to you. sean: chad pergram, by the way, hitchhikers guide to everything in life, chad pergram. as the democrats impeachment coup now unfolds, the top republican on the house judiciary committee, congressman doug collins, by the way, who should be appointed the position for the senate in the great state of georgia, no idea what the republican governor of georgia is doing. o i will get to it in a second. but anyway, doug collins has turned into a rock star, demanding that a central corrupt figure in the entire ordeal, the corrupt compromised cowardly congenital liar adam schiff be made to testify. one note about congressman collins, he would be the single best choice to fill that senatel seat, vacated by the retiring senator, good guy, somebody thai i have known for years, he has some health issues, johnny isakson. we wish him well. a leading conservative voice,h doug collins, in the house. single-handedly helped spearhead the g.o.p. impeachment coup resistance with great, great courage and conviction, unlike so many others. i don t know why the governor of georgia, i consider it my second home, brian kemp, is attempting what appears to be ai untested big republican romney donor, described by many as a rhino. we have invited governor kemp on radio and tv to explain this decision. why appoint a huge romney supporter, not a trump supporter? some groups this person is associated with has raised a lot of questions. inclining multiple invitations. he can t find 5 minutes either today or tomorrow. meanwhile back in the swamp, the judiciary committee chairman, jerry nadler, has a stranglehold on the impeachment proceeding as he runs his talk show this week. byron york in a deadly column in the washington examiner points out that this has always been a bad faith impeachment. many democrats wanted to impeach trump from the get-go. frustrated at their inability to get it done, they jumped on their last best hope of taking every shortcut to ensure their preferred result. racing to beat the political deadline imposed by the party s presidential contest. two key things now stand in the way of the democrats political hit job. one, democrats in swing districts. they are feeling the heat as public support for impeachment is seeing a massive decline. and two, this decline in support might have something to do with the fact that there is zero evidence of any wrongdoing. there was no quid pro quo. like joe, and his zero experience millionaire son hunter, that has been echoed many times by the president of ukraine, including his most recent interview again. this weekend withrv time magazine. zelensky saying, look, i never talk to the president from a position of quid pro quo. i don t know why you re doing this. but the answer to president zelensky is there is corruption in this country like corruption you inherited. by the way, look at what 1998 was like.ti let s listen to congressman jerry nadler railing against impeachment, you might remember this. same guy, 1998. does not earn the confidence of the american people in any action we take, especially if we seek to overturn the result of a free election will be viewed with great suspicion and could divide a nation for years to come. we do not need a decade of candidates running for office accusing each other of railroading a democratically elected president out of office or participating in a thinly veiled coup d etat. one of the reasons we all feel so angry about what they r are doing is that they are ripping from us, they are ripping asunder our votes. they are telling us that our votes don t count. they must never have a narrowly voted impeachment or an impeachment supported by one of our major political parties and largely opposed by the other. the american people have heard the allegations against the president, and they overwhelmingly oppose impeaching him.e the elected president clinton, they still support him. we have no right to overturn the considered judgment of the american people. this partisan coup d etat will go down in infamy in the history of this nation. sean: that was 1998 jerry nadler. 2019 jerry nadler is now chairing the committee to impeach a president along party lines based on no evidence. a lot more on the breaking news, this is huge, the battle between barr and the inspector general on the origins of the russia witch hunt. senator lindsey graham joining us.a first joining us, florida congressman matt gaetz, fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett, author of the next red wave, a law director of the spokesperson, member of the trump legal team jordan sekulow. matt gaetz, i will start with you, you can go to any aspect of any of this. so we have a bunch of professors. i wonder if they will throww chairs like it is a jerry springer show. because anything they say iss meaningless to any trial that would take place in the senate. democrats, having seen poll numbers for impeachment decrease over the past two weeks, now believe what will save their case is a parade of law professors to lecture the american people that it is really not what the american people want to that matters,s, like reforming the asylum laws, or lowering prescription drug prices. we should be incensed by what has captivated adam schiff and the radical left.. but i still remember, sean,se wn the radical left told us that ia we elected on donald trump, it would strengthen our enemies and weaken our alliances.s you have isis with their caliphate crumbled, and you have president trump going to london to a nato that is at its strongest point possibly in history because president trump went outside the box and got our friends to pay their fair share. it is the same out-of-the-box thinking and approach that he is getting impeached now. and it is a total sham.e sean: gregg jarrett, the inspector general, the original mandate was fisa abuse. okay, he comes to a different conclusion on the russia witch hunt, no power to put forth indictments and prosecute criminal cases, but durham does. and he is getting into all of that, but that was his mandate, was it not? that is, and i m sure that barr s opinion is informed by john durham s investigation and the results so far. as i argued in both of my books, you have to have two things to launch an investigation by the fbi of, in this case, donald trump. you have to have a reasonable basis to believe that a crime is committed. and second of all, you have to have specific, articulable facts of that crime. the fbi had none of those things. they had just a couple of things. they had papadopoulos hearing a rumor that russians had hillary clinton s emails. it is not a crime to hear a rumor.ad second, they have a dossier that was completely unverified.d. they even went to christopher steele who wrote it and offered him $50,000 to corroborate any of it, he could not. this investigation, barr is correct, should never have been launched in july of 2016, andy nine months later, comey admitted in his testimony that they still had no evidence, so the special counsel should not have been appointed. sean: jordan, your take on it legally? legally here, it is attorney general barr, not the inspector general, who directs the department of justice through the u.s. attorneys to bring criminal charges. the inspector general issues a report about wrongdoing. so that is point 1. if the attorney general has a disagreement, guess who will win out the day? he can issue a note in the report that he disagrees with us.it and instruct his u.s. attorneys. like durham to move along with prosecutions that they see fit or grand juries that they see fit. but sean, one thing i want to note tonight, on wednesday when we hear from the four law professors, i was waiting all day, when was jerry nadler going to releas the list, because i had suspicions about who would be on here. noah feldman, he was one of the first people, he is a professor of harvard law to say that ukraine, the call was a crime. you have pamela carlin, she was 1 of 42 legal scholars who signed a letter before trump took office attacking president trump, michael gerhardt on record advocating for impeachment. and only one witness, jonathan hurley. saying no to impeachment. sean: by the way, matt gaetz, i heard that you are an interloper, but apparently the governor s apparently, that s what they are saying in georgia. we will talk tomorrow. lindsey graham weighs in next on our big breaking news, and the no malarkey tour, disaster for joe. these folks, they don t have time to go to the post office they have businesses to grow customers to care for lives to get home to they use stamps.com print discounted postage for any letter any package any time right from your computer all the amazing services of the post office only cheaper get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again! sean: all right, breaking just moments ago from the washington post, the attorney general of the united states bill barr has expressed disagreement with the ig s findings surrounding the origins of the russia probe. that was not his original mandate. that is the mandate of john durham. now if true, it looks like, well, this explains a lot. doesn t it? here for reaction, the huge development, senator lindsey graham. we expect, all right, you broke it here on the show. one week from today, we will get the ig report on fisa abuse. it is supposed to be fisa abuse. durham was appointed as, i understood, for the origins of githe russia probe. but also that has now officially a criminal investigation expanding also into fisa abuse and other issues. the inspector general has no power to convene a grand jury, has no power, for example, he pointed out mccabe and comey lacked candor, so nothing happened as a result of that. but here s what i want to ask you. but is it not incontrovertible that there were multiple warnings to the fbi and doj not to use the clinton bought and paid for russian dossier, that it was unverifiable, and that there was a bias of christopher steele, and a memo called the grassley-graham memo, says the bulk of information for those applications was the unverified dossier. isn t that now established fact in the case? i believe it to be so, but horowitz, we will see what he says. but the first thing i want to say is be wary of the washington post and a the new york times reporting on what is coming up with horowitz. they have been trying over time to spin this thing, to diminish the effect, to downplay it. i can tell you without any hesitation, attorney general barr has every confidence in the world in mr. hoorwitz. he believes that he has done aco good job, a professional job, and he appreciates the work and the effort he has put into disclosing abuse at the department of justice. in december 2017, mccabe testified in the house, according to the house intel memo, that without the steele dossier, there would be no warrant issued. so what i will ask mr. horowitz, do you agree with that? without the dossier, there would be no warrant? is the dossier reliable to this day? did they know that steele had a bias? did they ignore it? when did they get the warrant, before or after? and here s what we will find, that they pulled a fast one on the fisa court, misled and defrauded the fisa court. i think that s what you will find. sean: okay, so you will have him in your committee one week from this wednesday. we get the report a week from tonight. i want to be very clear, though. i think some of this wouldwo explain that the delay aspects of all of this, one. but i ve been told clearly that the facts are devastating. as he lays out the facts. he may not make the conclusions, but that would not be his purview anyway. number one, i have every confidence that he will be fair to everybody. the people investigated, the public, the trump campaign, and all of us.wi but here is the point, no warrant without the dossier, the question for me and everybody else is, how reliable is the dossier?ie did they know that it was unreliable? when did they first tried to verify it? before the warrant or after the warrant? where they warned that christopher steele was out to get trump? did they ignore those warnings? if all of that proved to be true, it is devastating. every american should be concerned. and the fisa court should do something about it. and if they accept this as okay behavior, that maybe we should get rid of the fisa court. sean: okay, agreed. by the way, i would hate to see that actually. because there is a lot of evil in the world, and you know what, there is evil i don t care if it is abroad or domestic, we have enemies domestic and foreign. we need to get to the bottom of this. my major concern in all of this. is horowitz already referred, you know, for further investigation, mccabe and comey for lying. didn t michael cohen, paul manafort, recently roger stone run into issues involving lack of candor that led to guilty admissions, convictions? yeah, so he referred people for prosecution, comey, they decided not to prosecute based on what the clinton email investigation. i trust barr to be fair, too. i don t know what is in the report, but here s what i do believe. if there was a counterintelligence investigation of the trump campaign, and there was credible evidence to open the investigation, why did they not tell trump? when dianne feinstein hady somebody in her office they believed to work for communist china, they told dianne, and she fired the person. if they are investigating a campaign and they don t tell the campaign about the foreignam influence, then that truly is spying. sean: here is what i have been told before the show, and this is what i was told numerous times, that the facts that thes ig will put before the american people will shock the conscience. they will be devastating to many people. but it will be up to barr and durham. it will be up to the attorney general 100%. sean: the attorney general and durham and his report. and now a criminal investigation to hold them accountable, which by the way, no inspector general has the ability to convene a grand jury, make charges, and prosecute, do they? exactly, he is not a prosecutor. he is looking to find out if the system got off the rails, how to protect it or change it in the future, how to make sure it never happens again. the best way to make sure that the fisa court is not defrauded in the future is to hold those people accountable who actually did this. sean: last question, is it then fair to say that there will be a map that will be laid out by horowitz for the attorney general, for durham, and they will also by the way, we are told that their investigation is far more advanced than anybody knew it this point. that is a good way to look at it. you should look at this investigation as sort of a road map of where you might go criminally. sean: whatever differences there are, i guess the person that decides will be the attorney general.nc will be mr. durham. if they are investigating my campaign and they think that somebody on my campaign is influenced by a foreign government, and they don t tell me, and they keep spying on my campaign, i would be really pissed. every politician in america should be worried about this. if, in fact, they open up a counterintelligence investigation of the trump campaign and they never told him about it, than that truly is n spying. and every politician in america should be worried. sean: last point, counterintelligence investigation has to start with the president. that president would have been obama. this is just the beginning.ig this is just the beginning. sean: the mystery begins to unfold finally. monday, i hope it is not delayet again. senator, thank you. we appreciate your time. also tonight, hunter biden t fighting to keep his finances secret. fox news chief correspondent trace gallagher is live in the newsroom in new york tonight. wow. look at this with the very latest. he s bicoastal. new york where it is snowing. not clear what is exactly and hunter biden s financial documents. his attorneys are arguing that the information will be used by us, the media, to cause him undue prejudice, annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression. a laundry list of possibilities, yet his attorneys argued that none of the documents have anything to do with biden s ongoing paternity lawsuit. the mother of the child is demanding $11,000 in legal feesc as well as child support, but in court documents, hunter biden, who lives in california, is indicating that he has taken on significant debt since he divorced his wife back in 2017. biden also reportedly says that he has no monthly income since may of this year. experts say the documents could give us more insight into exactly what happened to the money he received as a board member for the ukrainian gas company burisma. finally, we should note that moments before a hearing on the case today, three lawyers representing hunter bidenn withdrew from the case citing irreconcilable conflict. dr sean: trace gallagher, thank you. today, 337 days until you, we, the people, we get to make the final decision. this election.is and by the way, look at biden s biggest opponents.d well, continues to be himself. and his campaign has gone from bloopers to blunders, and weirdness to just downright bizarre. during an appearance with his wife, the no malarkey tour in iowa over the weekend, bidenno had, well, i guess the only way to describe it is a biting moment, literally.ha take a look. and when they cut to the president of the united states [laughter] sean: did he just bite her? i guess so. but it gets more bizarre. a resurfaced clip from june 2017. look at this. there is no biden in his speech talking about his time as a lifeguard and his hairy well, blonde bleached legs. ask yourself as you watch this, does this scare you if he becomes president? and by the way, you know, i sit on the stand, and get hot, i have hairy legs that turned that turned blonde in the sun. and the kids used to come up and reach in the pool and rub my leg down so that it was straight and then watch the hair come back up again. they would look at it. so i learned about roaches and kids jumping on my lap, and i love kids jumping on my lap. sean: what the hell did he just say there? okay, i never do this on the show, can you rerack that? i want to play that again. see if you can ascertain what he is actually saying and what that means based on everything else we know like joe, 30330, which meant nothing. take a look again. and by the way, you know, i sit on the stand, and get hot. i got hairy legs that turned that turned blonde in the sun. and the kid used to come up and reach in the pool and rub my leg down, so it was straight, and then watch the hair come back up again. they would look at it. so i learned about roaches. i learned about kids jumping on my lap, and i love kids jumping on my lap. sean: wow, okay. if you can interpret that, you are a far better person than i am. s this is the democratic so-called front runner. this is the man democrats thinkk can beat trump. is this the man that you want to be your president? just when you think biden cannot get any worse, can t put his campaign in any more damage control, biden finds a way to sink even lower. he lost the fastball. he never had one, i don t think he has an underhand pitch at this point, because the fact is, biden does not have much to run on. and by the way, it has gotten so bad that he is flat out making things up like falsely claiming that he spent time with north korea s kim jong un. the only problem is, he didn t. take a look. you re going to have to assume that position the moment they are, like, sworn in on january 20th, and know that them rest of the world knows that person, in this case, me, and that i know them. putin has no illusions about whether i know him or not. kim jong un has no if i know him or not. the same with the president of china, xi jinping, i spent a lot of time with these folks. they know. they know.i and they know i know. sean: they know, and they know that i know. a but the mullahs in iran, you gave them $150 billion, that was dumb. yeah, and you gave vladimir more flexibility. let s release those transcripts. think about it. we also have biden on tape admitting that you are not getting the billion dollars unless you of course fire the prosecutor that i know your prosecutors investigating my zero experienced son whose being paid millions. you got six hours, son of a b, they did it, making gaffe after gaffe, his quid and his pro and his quo with joe. and you have the obama-biden record, 13 more million americans on food stamps, 18 million more in poverty. the lowest labor participation rate since the 70s, the worst recovery since the 40s, and the lowest homeownership rate in 50 years. he is trapped, he is tired, he is in big trouble, and voters apparently are turning out sleepy creepy crazy uncle joe 30330. political reporter detailed a remarkable exchange at an iowa diner where a farmer was sitting next to biden and had no idea who he was. as the reporter tweeted, well, i asked the guy if he just wasn t not a fan of the bidens, and he said, who? the man never heard of joe biden. i guess that s why joe biden is on a last ditch desperation bus tour, the no malarkey express in the hawkeye state. m in 337 days, thank god, we, the people, you, the american people get to shock the world again. it s all in your hands. when we come back, if you think being called deplorable, smelly walmart shopper, clinging to god above or bibles or second amendment rights and religion makes us bad, wait till you hear what trump supporters were called this time. dan bongino, ari fleischer react to that straight ahead. dan bongino, ari fleischer react [ turn around, look at me -the vogues ] there is someone walking behind you turn around look at me there is someone look at me is so wide open. just put an extra layer for chilly evenings around the campfire. i want to feel that cool crisp air on my face but i want to be warm at the same time. can i just say i want it all? (male announcer) check out thousands of great deals at bass pro shops and cabela s. like natural reflections ladies notch neck sweaters starting at under $15. redhead men s sherpa lined flannel shirts for under $20. and jumbo play sets for under $25. plus free 2-day shipping. good morning, mr. sun. good morning, blair. [ chuckles ] whoo. i m gonna grow big and strong. yes, you are. i m gonna get this place all clean. i ll give you a hand. and i m gonna put lisa on crutches! wait, what? said she s gonna need crutches. she fell pretty hard. you might want to clean that up, girl. excuse us. when owning a small business gets real, progressive helps protect what you built with customizable coverage. -and i m gonna -eh, eh, eh. -donny, no. -oh. -and i m gonna -eh, eh, eh. i am not for ignoring the first sign of a cold. i am for shortening my cold, with zicam! zicam is completely different. unlike most other cold medicines, zicam is clinically proven to shorten colds. i am a zifan for zicam! oral or nasal. the amount of student loan debt i have, i m embarrassed to even say. we just decided we didn t want debt any longer. i didn t realize how easy investing could be. i m picking companies that i believe in. i think sofi money is amazing. thank you sofi. sofi thank you, we love you. sean: the psychotic hate-trump-media mob is not taking a break from the 24/7, their rage fueled psychosis on sunday. yes, msdnc conspiracy theory channel, area 51 rachel maddow friend joy reid had some really nasty things to say about trump supporters. joy, this is not very nice.hi take a look. it is not just perjorative that say it is a cult. there is a lot of evidence that it is a racial and religious cult of personality where his base is solidly among the white evangelicals. that almost worship him and say that he is the chosen one of god. sean: pretty unbelievable, also tonight the first lady melania trump s annual christmas decorations, yeah, once again sparking outrage and anger from the mob. one daily beast reporter saying melania trump s joyless christmas decorations will haunt your nightmares. here with reaction, fox news contributors ari fleischer, dan bongino. good to see you both. ari, if melania reads books to young children, she gets attacked. melania trump puts up christmas decorations, she gets attacked. it is never ending. i don t remember that happening to michelle. except when she said, for the first time in my adult life i am proud of my country. yeah, well, this is what i find so distressing about the atmosphere today.in and the one thing that i try to be in politics is fair-minded, and to give my critics of people who oppose my thoughts the benefit of the doubt that they are good people with good motives. but once you start talking about people who disagree and you being in cults, this is what is so divisive and harmful to america. i don t view the people that oppose president trump as evil. that is their pointt of view. they are entitled to do that. they should afford the same respect to people who support the president and particularly his wife. it is out-of-bounds to have these criticisms against her. where are all of the women s magazines that used to have first ladies on the cover? they don t grace the covers of melania, do they? sean: dan bongino, i am a christian, i always think christians are kind of attacked, and that s why i kind of like kanye s new album and his bravery, because he wants to be a better person. to me, okay, i want to help, i need help. that s how i view christianity. everybody thinks for some reason that christians are perfect, they are not. nobody is. what is amazing about this, everybody has that, if you are a christian, you do believe. this is not about race. we are all children of god created by the same father. you believe in his son, jesus. this integrated church, more predominantly depending on area demographics, might have more of one race than another, but the same brotherhood and belief, isn t it? absolutely, amen to that, sean. i am with you on that. i am a sinner, and i feel like i was saved a long time ago. i am as far from perfect as any human being on this planet. and you would think i must say, ari is one of the nicest guys i ve met at fox along with you, sean, he s much nicer than me. i just don t he really is, but i just don t see the left that way. i appreciate that he tries to t find the good in people, but maybe it is the skeptic in me, i have had that beaten out of me, running for office a couple of times myself, and watched what the left and the media does to people. i m not saying that there aren t good people out there on the left, there are. it would be ridiculous to say as much, but the percentage of good people left amongst the radical left is small. who attacks christmas. like christmas decorations? you realize what kind of lunatic you have to be to find something wrong with christmas decorations? that is like finding something wrong with the big mac or something. what is wrong with these people? sean: ari, do you want to respond to that? there is nothing wrong with a big mac. [laughter] sean: i love big macs! stop attacking, i prefer the quarter pounder with cheese though. [laughter] i am all for going after your opponents in politics. that is part of the american tradition.r that s how democracy gets stronger and we should fight about ideas and personalities, and we have always been a noisy democracy. people always say nasty things about each other, but somehow in america we have always kept it within the bounds. we always kept it within the hard lines. sean: i disagree, ari, i don t ever think that they were fair to george bush. i thought they were vicious to bush. well, they were vicious to bush, and face it, sean, a lot of conservatives are vicious to obama, and people are vicious to trump. we have been in a bad cycle the last 10, 15 years. i tried to break that cycle because i think it s important. sean: thank you, both. new evidence unearthed tonight on the bbc, raising more doubts against prince andrew and his friendship with jeffrey epstein, lolita express. this j report is shocking next. when we started our business we were paying an arm and a leg for postage. i remember setting up shipstation. one or two clicks and everything was up and running. i was printing out labels and saving money. shipstation saves us so much time. it makes it really easy and seamless. pick an order, print everything you need, slap the label onto the box, and it s ready to go. our costs for shipping were cut in half. just like that. shipstation. the #1 choice of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get 2 months free. sean: a lot more questions to answer tonight after the bbc aired its explosive interview with one of jeffrey epstein s accusers. trace gallagher has the very latest on this unfolding saga. he was caught in his interview in five, six, seven lies, specific lies? this is the first interview from virginia giuffre. formerly known as virginia roberts. she told the bbc when she was 17 she was traffic by jeffrey epstein and forced to have sex with prince andrew and this is what she said. i m calling b.s. on this because that is what it is. he knows what happened. she also claims she went dancing with prince andrew. watch. this guy was sweating. sweat was raining everywhere. grossed out from it. i knew i had to keep him happy because that s what jeffrey epstein would ve expected. he had a gland problem. maxwell, epstein s girlfriend and reports in allegations with the prince having sex with virginia roberts broke, she sent an email to the prince and said she had information. the news continues. laura: hannity, did you have a good thanksgiving? sean: i fried my turkey. why does everybody think that everybody wants to see the pictures of every aspect of your life? i never post anything. laura: i know, your stuff mostly about politics and humor which i like. sean: they don t really give a rip, me and my dog. oh, here is me doing this. laura: occasionally, i ve done a dog but very rarely.e but, hannity, people now put on twitter and i m sure i ve offended this rule that belongs on instagram. instagram and facebook are not twitter. and i have to listen to that, kind of unspoken rule and perhaps sean: can i tell you? i gave it up to my staff.an i don t even have acce
The Stanford Internet Observatory studied how social media platforms are abused. Now, its top leaders are out and future funding is uncertain amid attacks on its work by conservatives.