U.S. Supreme Court justices in Trump case lean toward some level of immunity
Conservative Justice Clarence Thomas asks why no president had been prosecuted before now, citing a controversial Cold War-era U.S. operation in Cuba
Stay updated with breaking news from John Sauer. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Conservative Justice Clarence Thomas asks why no president had been prosecuted before now, citing a controversial Cold War-era U.S. operation in Cuba
The former president's lawyers mounted some bizarre arguments in defense of broad presidential power, and the justices seemed ready to step through the looking glass.
The US Supreme Court on Thursday considered whether presidents are immune from prosecution for actions taken while in office.
The Supreme Court appeared ready to reject former President Donald Trump’s claims of sweeping immunity and the broad protections he has sought to shut down his federal election subversion case, but also reluctant to give special counsel Jack Smith carte blanche to pursue those charges.
Presidents could be immune from prosecution even if they stage a coup or assassinate a political rival, one of Donald Trump’s lawyers argued at the US Supreme Court.