Live Breaking News & Updates on Ohio Replacement Program|Page 3
Stay updated with breaking news from Ohio replacement program. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Money we have given them. And theyebuild china know it. I have many friends from china. I dont have any objection to china, i think its wonderful, i am angry at our people, not their people, if you can get away with it. So look, weve rebuild china. It is not free trade, it is not anything, this is horrible, stupid trade. When you have 500 billion a folks, weve got to get smart. I have carl icon, i have the greatest negotiators in the ahn, i havearl ic the greatest negotiators in the world. We had pfizer, a great company, pfizer, they Just Announced they are leaving. They are a huge drug company. They announced they are going to ireland. Companies are going to mexico. Nabisco, ford, where are they going . Mexico. Mexico, mark my words, exit code is a small version of china. We better get smart and we ter get smart quickly mexico, mark my words, mexico is a small version of china. We better get smart and we better get smart quickly. ....
Could build for the cost of one of our carriers. Its an interesting statistic, but those missiles are kind of useless without satellite constellations, without isr ground isr status, without an extensive networking system connecting these nodes, without operation centers. There is a certain amount of cost that goes into the delivering of that weapon that gets forgotten about when we do that math. First class hannah nobel. This is a question for dr. Hendricks. You spoke about a submerged arsenal, but if the carriers were to be mixed, what do you propose would replace them, and how would their mission be fulfilled in their absence . So were getting ready to try to field the ohio class replacement. Its coming in with with an estimate of about 6. 6 billion a copy with some estimates up around 7. 2. The original or the four ssgns we have are actually the first four of the original ohio class. Due to treaty limitations, we had to repurpose, so we took them out of service as submarines and we ....
We have a pretty good way of looking at the relationship between supply and demand. On the supply side you can capture this in a diagram. What it would look like under this budget and what it would look like under sequester. It is not a pretty story when you compare that to the requirements around the globe. I am talking about real requirements for presence and crisis response. It is starting to get ready pretty dicey, that that is why we are saying manageable risk. Im told you have 7. 9 billion for investment, reset and readiness which sounds a lot like putting money on procurement and operations make in its, do you have a criteria in mind when you decide what you will get from that account . Some people think that is pure padding. We would be the first to say that over the course of a decade or so that we havent overseas Contingency Operation funding, too much has crept into that account. We are determined to fix that. It ....
Or are there other costs as well . We follow the same rules. This is no deviation from that. It. It includes costs from the missions we are doing. As has been the case for many years. Those bases will presumably stay a while. After next year, right now the number of troops is supposed to go down to nothing. But, we are still going to see overseas Contingency Operations until at least 2020 . What you will see in the budget documents released which i have not had a chance to review myself is a proposal that we Work Together in the executive branch and congress to move some of those costs for what takes place in the command region to the budget if circumstances allow us to do so. The department is not able to absorb those costs within a big topline however. If the war ends, why cant that be done quicker the transition . It can be done quickly as a larger budget negotiatio ....