Broadcasting live from our studios in moscow this is our Team International on shine thomas glad to have you with us as we recap the weeks top stories with our Weekly Program now the New York Times is facing widespread criticism after it published an article saying that russia offered bounties in afghanistan to kill u. S. Troops it also claims donald trump was briefed on the matter however the director of National Intelligence denies that either the president or the Vice President were ever briefed on this and trying himself labelled the piece fake news as a free news New York Times must release anonymous conduit this person probably does not even exist. The article has been slammed by the Russian Foreign ministry which called the piece deliberate disinform aeration a saturday also saw the taliban denying the New York Times article of comments now on the piece in question and asks who might benefit from its publication its time to blow off the dust that settled on any smear tactics gui
Now one of the things that has been possible in me is that all of the call that 19 pandemic is that in many countries its economists spread merrily liberally minded economists who are very much in favor of the strictest possible while many it could mean all the just and other Public Health professionals are a forum or are reserved about such tools mashers how do you explain that. What i think it what economists did early on starting in march the reason university of chicago study was they took the most extreme. Model which was the Imperial College of london model which has been shown to be fundamentally flawed and they said ok lets take that as given and then lets look at lets kind of see what policies will save how many lives and they came up with us an astounding measure 1760000 wives which now by the way birch really no one believes that anyway thats what they said and then they took this value of a statistical life that economists talk about i can explain that a little more she was
While to discuss that im now joined by David Hammond arsen a Research Fellow with the Hoover Institution at Stanford University professor henderson its good to talk to you thank you very much for your time and if youre actually now one of the things that has been possible in me is that all of the call that 19 pandemic is that in many countries its economists spread merrily liberally minded economists who are very much in favor of the strictest lowdown possible while many at the dimmy all exist and other Public Health professionals are a forum or are reserved about such tools mashers how do you explain that. What i think it what economists did early on starting in march the reason university of chicago study was they took the most extreme. Model which was the Imperial College of london model which has been shown to be fundamentally flawed and they said ok lets take that as given and then lets look at lets kind of see what policies will save how many lives and they came up with us an ast
Actually now one of the things that has been possible in me is that all of the call that 9000 pandemic is that in many countries its economists spread merrily liberally minded economists who are very much in favor of the strictest possible while many it could mean all exist and other Public Health professionals are a forum or are reserved about such tools mashers how do you explain that. What i think it what economists did early on starting in march the reason university of chicago study was they took the most extreme. Model which was the Imperial College of london model which has been shown to be fundamentally flawed and they said ok lets take that as given and then lets look at lets kind of see what policies will save how many lives and they came up with us an astounding measure 1760000 wives saved which now by the way birch really no one believes that anyway thats what they said and then they took this value of a statistical life that economists talk about i can explain that a littl
Are you watching are to International Thanks for joining us. The New York Times is facing widespread criticism after it published an article saying russia had offered bounties in afghanistan to kill u. S. Troops and also claimed that donald trump had been briefed on the matter however the director of National Intelligence as deny that either the president all the Vice President were never briefed on this trump himself has labeled the piece fake news. New york times must release anonymous source they can do it this person probably does not even exist the article is being slammed by Russias Foreign Ministry which called the piece deliberate disinform ation saturday also saw the taliban denying the New York Times article. Takes a closer look at the piece in question and asks who might benefit from its publication. Its time to blow off the dust that circled around any smear tactics guide book since the last us election but as democrats are looking to wash away the humiliation of 2016 by tr