Live Breaking News & Updates on Requirement bill

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Requirement bill on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Requirement bill and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Newsnight

the right _ we cannot afford to give everybody the right. it is not a right but a fantastic— the right. it is not a right but a fantastic blessing. and it is wonderful when you could make it happen— wonderful when you could make it happen and i do admire you hugely. but i happen and i do admire you hugely. but lam _ happen and i do admire you hugely. but i am very nervous of this possibility of changing the law. you knew _ possibility of changing the law. you knew what — possibility of changing the law. you knew what you are doing and did not change _ knew what you are doing and did not change your— knew what you are doing and did not change your mind for the bonding with a _ change your mind for the bonding with a child is an extraordinary and individual— with a child is an extraordinary and individual thing. and for me it happened at the moment of birth. i felt nothing in my pregnancies but at the _ felt nothing in my pregnancies but at the moment of birth i would have killed _ at the moment of birth i would have killed to _ at the moment of birth i would have killed to save that baby. but at the moment of birth i would have killed to save that baby.— killed to save that baby. but you created that _ killed to save that baby. but you created that they _ killed to save that baby. but you created that they be _ killed to save that baby. but you created that they be with - killed to save that baby. but you created that they be with your i created that they be with your husband. ., ~ created that they be with your husband. ., ,, , ., created that they be with your husband. ., ~' ,, ,., , created that they be with your husband. ., ,, i. , . there was no requirement for donald trump to attend a federal appeals court in washington dc today, but he arrived bang on time in his camera—ready presidential motorcade to hear his lawyers argue that he should have presidential immunity from prosecution when it comes to actions taken as president. that's the first of many court cases facing him. here's joe inwood.

Law , Right , Possibility , Everybody , Blessing , Lam , Child , Thing , Nothing , Mind , Birth , Bonding

The Faulkner Focus

who comes next. i asked him if that was a threat and he just smiled. this man is dangerous. he knows exactly what he is doing and he is two faced. we need to get rid of him now. >> harris: what did he mean who comes next? >> well, that was the big question. i asked him i said is that a threat? he just smiled and i thought this man knows exactly what he is doing. this is 100% by design. they want an open border crisis whether it's for future votes, get rid of citizenship as a requirement for voting we're not sure. he was very clear in what he said and other members in the room. i will never forget that and as we go to impeach him for his negligence, for him destroying our national security and eroding our national sovereignty it will be top of mind. >> harris: yeah, i wish somebody had gotten that on tape to play it over and over. perhaps we will when you go into session with him to ask questions bring that up. it sounded like a threat.

Harris-faulkner , Man , Threat , Big-question , Two , Crisis , Border , Votes , Design , 100 , Members , Security

The Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer

tomorrow's hearing. he's used appearances for political benefit, but is there any legal benefit for him being there tomorrow? >> at most as atmospheric. when he's on trial, he has to be physically in the courtroom. we'll see that playing out. but on an appellate argument, there's no requirement that the parties appear. in fact, it's quite unusual to have the actual defendant appear. he has every right to do so, but in my experience, you almost never see the actual defendant there. it is his right to be there. his lawyers may point out the presence, to make the point he cares, but the obvious reality is he's doing it as a political appeared pr move more than a legal move. we have learned that judge chutkan was the victim of a very disturbing swatting call, after

Benefit , Appearances , Hearing , Atmospheric , Argument , Fact , Defendant , Courtroom , Trial , Parties , Requirement , Point

Ayman

targeting military objectives, to targeting enemy combatants that prohibit sexual violence, that prohibit hostage taking. on the other hand, in connection with israel's military action in gaza, the, while siege warfare is not per se on lawful, when the effects of siege warfare result in the absolute breakdown of society, starvation, disease, israel has an obligation to either provide or to permit the provision of humanitarian assistance into gaza. israel has not been fulfilling that requirement to the extent that would be necessary. i think there are also concerns about israel's attacks. they may well be targeting illegitimate military objectives, but when you use a 2000 unguided barham to kill a

Israel , Sexual-violence , Military-objectives , Hand , Connection , Gaza , Action , Hostage-taking , Enemy-combatants , Effects , Siege-warfare , Starvation

Ayman

conflict. some of them have criminal consequences, some of them don't. the geneva conventions, for example, requires that where president years of war are concerned, the detaining authorities are required to provide them with musical instruments. now, if there is a violation of that requirement, it's not a war crime. i'm not aware of any country that criminalized that. on the other hand, the geneva conventions and the international criminal court require criminalization and have criminalization of serious violations of the law of armed conflict, such as, targeting civilians, sexual assault, using human shields, taking hostages, failing to take precautionary measures to minimize civilian harm, or even conducting attacks against legitimate military objectives where the consequence is in

President , Some , Geneva-conventions , Second-world-war , Example , Consequences , Authorities , Culture-country , Violation , War-crime , Hand , Requirement

CNN Newsroom Live

attacks. what are the expectations of this trip with regard to israel? we know the u.s. is biggest assumer of israel and certainly providing much of the weaponry used in this war. what do you think that we expect from this trip? >> i think that secretary blinken is here because he wants to get his -- put his finger on the pulse of what is happening in israel and what is the continued direction of the operation in the south. america would definitely like to see israel deescalate and move from the high intensity stage of the conflict to a less intense stage of the conflict where israel has a buffer zone, a greater defensive posture, but also will continue to go into gaza as needed to take out hamas infrastructure as a major requirement based on intelligence and operational needs. america would like to see that happen in the south. in the north as you mentioned, there was that massive barrage of rockets on saturday. the situation there is highly

War , Israel , Trip , United-states , Assumer , Expectations , Regard , Weaponry , Secretary-blinken , Finger , South , Pulse

Ayman

that requirement to the extent that would be necessary. i think there are also concerns about israel's attacks. they may well be targeting legitimate military objectives. but when you use a 2000 unguided bombs to kill a single hamas operative, and that results in what very well had to be expected to be massive amounts of civilian death, injury, and destruction of infrastructure, i think that raises serious questions about whether or not israel is complying with its law of war allegations to maintain a tax that do not disproportionately harm civilians. >> right. we certainly don't have time to talk about even just the concept of proportionality in this context. but i do want to get your reaction, professor, to the new york times investigation and sort of the real footage and images that were captured.

Israel , Attacks , Requirement , Objectives , Extent , Concerns , 2000 , Amounts , Hamas , Results , Death , Bombs

Ayman

crimes are violations of the law of armed conflict, that have been rendered criminal. >> understood. >> these were enacted in the geneva conventions, the reflected in the international criminal court statute, there are a lot of rules governing war. governing armed conflict. some of them have criminal consequences, some of them don't. the geneva conventions, for example, requires that where prisoners of war are concerned, the detaining authorities are required to provide them with musical instruments. now, if there is a violation of that requirement, it's not a war crime. i'm not aware of any country that criminalizes that. on the other hand, the geneva conventions and the international criminal court require criminalization and have criminalization of serious violations of the law of armed conflict, such as targeting

Law-of-armed-conflict , Violations , International-criminal-court , Geneva-conventions , Criminal , Lot , Second-world-war , Armed-conflict , Some , Example , Statute , Consequences

Alex Witt Reports

hear. so, what jack smith is doing in that direction is entirely proper. this is not a campaign trail. this is a trial. it's not a political arena, it is a courtroom. there's certain evidence it's not permissible for a charade here, but you don't want the jury to be considering politics when deciding these matters. he wants to focus on the evidence, and you want them to focus on the legal standards, as to whether or not he's guilty or innocent, that whether they think they like donald trump's politics and that's the basis for their decision. so, it's a perfectly appropriate motion for him to have made. now, there is a stay in the district court case, and that means everything is on hold. and jack smith filed this anyway. so donald trump is saying he should be held in contempt for having filed this motion, when there is a hold on everything. that is ludicrous. generally speaking, there is no requirement because there is a stay in place for donald trump and his lawyers to do anything.

Evidence , Trial , Courtroom , Jack-smith , Charade , Campaign-trail , Direction , Doing , Arena , Donald-trump , Politics , Basis

Alex Witt Reports

a more technical basis. one of the arguments that donald trump makes, and this was an argument that was supported in the dissent in the colorado supreme court, is that the colorado supreme court, there was a violation here of the statutes in colorado state electoral code. for how this all was supposed to be applied. for example, there was a five-day requirement for a hearing. and then following those five days, there was a two-day period where they're supposed to then be a decision. both of those requirements were violated here. basically, the colorado process required more time. why did require more time? because this was more complicated than what you normally see with qualifications about something like age, whether you have a certain amount of signatures. this was a more complex constitutional question that required some delays. so, the dissent makes the argument, and donald trump picks this up as well, look,

Donald-trump , Argument , Closing-arguments , Colorado-supreme-court , One , Dissent , Basis , Violation , All , Requirement , Example , Statutes