Stay updated with breaking news from Sol forge jedi. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Focus on the fact that he will stand up for his constitutional a rights on jewel 11th, i agree july 11th. i agree with sol that normal course of business requires the supreme court to even review once the highest court in the state has looked at the matter and add a jude candidated. finish adjudicated. there s a possibility, of course, that his team, donald trump s team, can appeal to the supreme court given that this is a novel issue that a president has never been convicted, we can see if the supreme court will take this up prior to exhausting all of the appellate process in new york or which, sol is right, it will take months and months for that to happen. if there is an issue during the sentencing on july 11th, that would restrict his freedoms in any way restrict his ability to campaign, is that an issue that the supreme court would see as a something they should review on ....
I still think it would be a long shot, but that would give them out because ren the posing a real conflict between the right of somebody to run. pr you know, a candidate to run its party effectively for president and the state judicial system. but still, it would be a long shot. chris, do you think it s a long shot? i think it s 5050. real quickr 50/5. you know, of course, it s a long shot, but this is just an extraordinary case in american history. this is not your normal criminal appeal. i mean, i understand what sol was saying is right, the run up to the mine case. but i think the supreme court, united state areits, now,h they re grappling with a presidential immunity case. they are verthese y familiar with these issues. again, they re the supreme court of the united stateseverye everything else is the courts of the state of new york, ste that states is uniquely qualified to recognize the compelling federal interest here. i m very concerned about the idea of trump just spendin s ....
Convention. rebecca rose woodland, sol wisenberg, the former independent deputy counsel, fox news contributor. sol, interesting couple of piece i ve been reading on the prospect of appealing something like this. in new york appellate courts though i understand rarely do they overturn a jury decision without evidence of serious error. so the obvious question to ask you, are there enough serious errors here to make an appeal and make an appeals court go the other way? well, i think there are very, very serious errors here, neil. to begin with, the fact that trump s lawyers really weren t given the actual theory, the actual facts about what other crimes. remember, they had to prove that he falsified business records with the intent to cover up or commit other crimes, and they weren t informed of that, the trump defense team, until right before closing arguments. ....
An immediate basis, we have no idea because we ve never seen this before. neil: okay. we have really no idea with what the process will be because we ve never seen this before. neil: i understand that. but you didn t quite answer my question, remember a ca. sol, can he vote in this election? all the points you both eloquently mentioned, this is a first. i believe the first time we have a presidential candidate who can t go ahead and vote for himself. it is the weird to me, but maybe that isn t the case. is it the case? sol? i really don t know the answer to your question. and one of the reasons i don t know is i don t know that he has been convicted. conviction is a term of art. for example, in the federal criminal system you aren t convicted until you re sentenced. neil: okay. so i also don t know what the new york law is on, you know, whether felons can vote. so i would, i would assume ....
Jail if even briefly while this is on appeal? well, jail is a possibility based on his 34 felony counts. i completely agree with sol about the appellate process in new york. air i ve appealed many cases in new york, and overwhelmingly the cases are affirmed. i believe in this matter the fact that there s a qume la ative the effect cumulative effect of negative judicial action towards defendant also will contribute to the appellate division possibly doing a review. now, you have the appellate division of the court of appeals, and then if those appeals are exhausted, he can then, you know, request the supreme court take a look at this based on the glaring constitutional errors and constitutional restrictions donald trump has faced. what we re looking at though on ....