Report on what happened on august 21st, when the u.s. says 1400 syrian civilians were killed by the syrian regime s use of chemical weapons. reporter: that s right. monday, everyone is telling me that s when we should see this report. it will be a very detailed document, showing basically everything from how the samples came out of the ground to what finally was in them. now, one western diplomat is saying to me that this will be able to suggest potentially who was behind it. it s not the u.n. inspector s mandate to assign blame but the level of detail they put in this report, this western diplomat says may allow some people to draw conclusions of who was behind it. there are some people speculating that perhaps syria s move today is preempting this particular report. we have to wait and see quite how that develops. but monday, we ll see this definitive report from the u.n. which they say is entirely independent and credible, specifying what was used on the 21st of august and perhaps hinting with enough detail so people can draw conclusions who
How much should we put that on the line to demand that they turn snowden back to us? i think you need to be very aggressive. it depends if they think he still have value. since the leaks, there has been a lot of criticism on the program from the right and left. i want to focus on conservatives, people like rand paul. they say fine, leave law abiding americans alone, take alook. this is what we partly objected to. they can go computer to computer or phone to phone without specifying who you re targeting.
Relationship. how much should we put that relationship on the line to demand that they turn snowden back to us? well, i think you need to be very aggressive about it. i m not sure it ll do any good. it depends, obviously, on whether or not the chinese believe he still has value from an intelligence standpoint. i ve got to believe they ll work that angle first before they decide whether or not they re going to turn him over. since the leak there has been a lot of criticism of the nsa program from both the right and the left. i want to focus on conservatives though. people like senator rand paul who say, fine, let the government target terrorists but leave law-abiding americans alone. take a look. this is what we objected to and what our founding fathers partly fought the revolution over. is they did not want generalized warrants where you could go house to house looking for things or now from computer to computer or phone to phone without specifying who you re targeting. question. is senator paul wrong?
Utah, that s flat out unconstitutional. here is what senator rand paul said. the fourth amendment says that you have to look at and you can ask for a warrant for a specific to a pepper, place in the items. this is a general warrant. this is what we objected to and what our founding fathers partly fought the revolution over is they did not want generalized warrants where you could go from house to house with soldiers to look for things and now computer to computer to phone to phone without specifying who you are targeting. bill: i agree. the feds will tell you. they won t go after a specific individuals unless there is probable cause. but there can t be probable cause unless they look at the emails to find a dubious situation. does everybody get this? well, some people dissent. they are not allowed to go into that data until they have a particular warrant signed0 judge with some cause, a
Utah, that s flat out unconstitutional. here is what senator rand paul said. the fourth amendment says that you have to look at and you can ask for a warrant for a specific to a pepper, place in the items. this is a general warrant. this is what we objected to and what our founding fathers partly fought the revolution over is they did not want generalized warrants where you could go from house to house with soldiers to look for things and now computer to computer to phone to phone without specifying who you are targeting. bill: i agree. the feds will tell you. they won t go after a specific individuals unless there is probable cause. but there can t be probable cause unless they look at the emails to find a dubious situation. does everybody get this? well, some people dissent. they are not allowed to go into that data until they have a particular warrant signed0 judge with some cause, a