Any public official. this is the commander in chief, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, to the speaker of the house asserting that the president of the united states is crazy seems on its face if that is true in violation of that provision. yes. laura: let s move on to article 134. all disorder and neglect for the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, all conduct of a nature to bring discredit on the armed services shall be punished at the discretion of that court. what w would a violation of tha like? that is a catch all violation of 134 and many different subcategories of that but if it is reasonably direct that it is a violation, if you meet the element and effect you can
And people who understand the pain of what this day represents i think we have an obligation to go out and remind people of the sacrifices that have been made on behalf of this country to stay free and what it takes to protect and to serve and to keep this country safe. i think that s what we have to do. we have to go out. look, 9/11 is by far the worst day in modern history in the united states on our soul but 9/12 was a day that showed the world, our allies, it showed strength. it showed how united the united states of america is. people came together. all these subcategories that this great country allows us to be and to identify as and to go out and live as, we all came together as one, as american. we came together as the core of us and we represented that across the globe. and, look, the strength of the
Other issues that he wants to present to putin. really lost opportunity as far as i m concerned. paul: on the cyber attacks issue, i was struck that the president basically laid out a red line. he said if you cross it, we will have to respond. number one, that means he s going to have to respond or lose all credibility. second, he laid out 16 specific areas that he said that are off limits. of course, if you only name 16, it implies that the other things that are on the aren t on the 16 are off limits. i assume that putin could-there s deniability on his part, not me, somebody else, and then there s the issue of just how we are able to pin this down. what do you think of laying out those 16 things that are off limits? yeah, i mean, it s misguided and i think it s a significant mistake. now, in those 16, there are a lot of subcategories so it s much more expansive than 16.
Globally at the option of each of those embassies. we are doing the ccp s bidding for them for criticizing the united states, by fracturing our nation in the eyes of other countries and in the world. it s different racial groups in different subcategories and in absence of a good reason for why the state department is advancing u.s. interests by doing this, i think it s folly and it s a mistake. shannon: back here at home, there continues to be conversation about things like critical race theory and about antiracism training. there are couple things going on here we wanted to know. one is from the u.s. air force base outside dayton, ohio. there is a newsletter there, the federalist got a copy of one of the latest versions of it. it said don t think of being an ally or being woke forces you to give up anything, the eight-page newsletter states, actually activating and participating for inclusivity is the act of improving everything so that s the military base. then we see that the largest u.s. hospital group is now going to require conscious inclusion training and employees also
It s because of homophobia. none of thisno will surprise yo, the minor democratic party is built on division. they divide the country into categories and subcategories, some skin colors are good, some are irredeemably bad. it s a jeans party now or not the kind you wear. it s simultaneously the party of identity politics and the party of wall street. the party of people who defend private equity, the party of people who fought to keep carried interest in the tax code, people who make absolutely certain they pay it half the rate you pay as a wage earner. they are also a massive and key component of the democratic party. these two groups are in it together. may be ocasio-cortez s but mike bloomberg still pays for everything. how can a coalition like that to