Stay updated with breaking news from Thomasg Krattenmaker. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
In a recent speech at the American Enterprise Institute, outgoingFederal Communications Commission Chairman Reed Hundt echoed theconcerns of countless policymakers when he asked, "is it [theTelecommunications Act of 1996] working?"
In a recent speech at the American Enterprise Institute, outgoingFederal Communications Commission Chairman Reed Hundt echoed theconcerns of countless policymakers when he asked, "is it [theTelecommunications Act of 1996] working?"
Nicholas Goldberg: The Supreme Court debates the all-powerful F-word Summary: This time the language wasn’t used to comment on a burning social issue. But isn’t it time we got over our squeamishness? Written By: Nicholas Goldberg, Los Angeles Times | 11:00 am, Apr. 26, 2021 × Fifty years ago, a 19-year-old L.A. man forced the Supreme Court to consider a provocative four-letter epithet. (Samuel Corum/Getty Images/TNS) The F-word will soon be coming to the nation’s most august courtroom — again. This time, it will get there courtesy of B.L., an anonymous young wom...
The F-word will soon be coming to the nation’s most august courtroom — again. This time, it will get there courtesy of B.L., an anonymous young woman who wrote a profanity-filled Snapchat post after she was rejected for her high school’s varsity cheerleading team. Her post — and her school’s decision to punish her for it — has ignited a free speech case that will be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court next week. But B.L. was not the first to focus the justices’ attention on the F-word. That distinction belongs to Paul Robert Cohen, whose case 50 years ago resulted in a landmar...
Column: The Supreme Court debates the all-powerful F-word Nicholas Goldberg © Provided by The LA Times Fifty years ago, a 19-year-old L.A. man forced the Supreme Court to consider a provocative four-letter epithet. (Associated Press) The F-word will soon be coming to the nation's most august courtroom — again. This time, it will get there courtesy of B.L., an anonymous young woman who wrote a profanity-filled Snapchat post after she was rejected for her high school's varsity cheerleading team. Her post — and her school’s decision to punish her for it — has ignited ...