judicial philosophy, and i think that's why we see different judges appointed by democratic and republican presidents. what i would say is this isn't the first president to criticize judicial decisions. i think what makes this different and why roberts felt compelled to speak out and because the president's criticism of the judiciary has been sustained and aggressive more so than his predecessors. you can only imagine judge roberts, whose obamacare decision was seen by many as a way to keep the court out of a highly political issue, had to know as a salvery player if he's going to go after the president on the eve of thanksgiving with no other news, that the president was not only going to respond but that a lot of people were going to see this. he must have felt either compelled or heard a lot of pressure from him beneath him as the leader of the judiciary branch to finally say something. one more thing, erin. the president had two years almost with a republican house and a republican senate, and the republican house is now going away, to change immigration law. what the 9th circuit said is you can't do what you're trying to do by executive order because