provisions that were allowed to expire in 1999. yesterday democrat chuck schumer took to the floor, criticizing the nominee for those comments. >> considering everything we know about judge kavanaugh's expansive view of executive power and accountability, the fact that morrison v. olsen, of all of the cases in the history of the supreme court, was the first case he could think of overturning is deeply, teamly troubling. we already know he believes a president shouldn't be investigated while in office. that a president can't be indicted while in office, that a present doesn't have to follow law that the president deems -- his words -- unconstitutional. clearly judge kavanaugh's judicial philosophy incorporates an almost menarchal view of executive accountability, animated by a belief our chief executive gets to play by a
Related Keywords
Comments , Brett Kavanaugh , Democrats , Everything , Nominee , Floor , Chuck Schumer , 1999 , Wall , Fact , Case , Cases , History , Morrison Versus Olsen , View , Supreme Court , Executive Power , Overturning , Accountability , Donald Trump , President , Law , Words , Office , Shouldn T , Doesn , Deems , Chief Executive , Kavanaughs Judicial Philosophy , Executive Accountability , Belief ,
vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.