disturbing. >> glenn, what is your take on this in particular. who will be asking the questions? it is not clarified if it's been worked out whether it's the senators or outside counsel that's been brought in, which is what they said they wanted to do, maybe me female counsel, to this delicate line of questioning. what's at stake here? >> it seems to me with the senators normally asking the questions and all of a sudden they're refusing to do that, that seems to me to be a part of weakness and fear that they don't want to be responsible for these questions, so they're trying to push it off on a third person, and i assume if it doesn't go well, they'll blame that third person. also, alex, if i can, i just want to take a moment to debunk the truth that nothing can be proved when it's a he said-she said contest. after 30 years of trying criminal courts in washington, d.c., i can't tell you how many times i had to prove a fact of consequence in my case when i had two conflicting witnesses.