Live Breaking News & Updates on bracknell office

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from bracknell office on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in bracknell office and stay connected to the pulse of your community

The Context

indictment. — and then it says and then subject to indictment, trial and prosecution. now i_ indictment, trial and prosecution. now i would say that clearly contemplates that a president, out of office. _ contemplates that a president, out of office, can be prosecuted for crimes— of office, can be prosecuted for crimes committed while in office. i don't _ crimes committed while in office. i don't think— crimes committed while in office. i don't think it requires impeachment to come _ don't think it requires impeachment to come first, like sequentially. so ithink— to come first, like sequentially. so i think that's the beginning and the end, i think that's the beginning and the end. i_ i think that's the beginning and the end. ithink— i think that's the beginning and the end, i think donald trump will lose in surrogate court, probably unanimously, and if this goes to the supreme _ unanimously, and if this goes to the supreme court as i think it will, most _ supreme court as i think it will, most likely he loses there as well. yeah, _ most likely he loses there as well. yeah, in _ most likely he loses there as well. yeah, in terms of the impeachment, joe, just one final point on this. if you recall, when mitch mcconnell, the most senior republican of the senate, was asked why he didn't vote in favour of impeachment in the second impeachment, he said because we have a criminaljustice system in this country, former presidents are not immune from being held accountable by either one. so when his view this argument that a president can only be impeached and then criminally and charged, doesn't hold weight either way. he then criminally and charged, doesn't hold weight either way.— then criminally and charged, doesn't hold weight either way. he made hot have realised —

-bracknell-office , President , Crimes , Criminal-prosecution , Trial , Impeachment , Indictment , Don-t , Contemplates , Like-sequentially , Donald-trump , Supreme-court

The Context

respect to those allegations were made today in court. the respect to those allegations were made today in court.— made today in court. the special counsel's office _ made today in court. the special counsel's office said _ made today in court. the special counsel's office said it _ made today in court. the special counsel's office said it would - made today in court. the special counsel's office said it would be | counsel's office said it would be awfully scary if it couldn't prosecute cases like trump's, if there was no mechanism to keep presidents from reserving the vote and remaining in power. were it not for the advice of white house counsel, donald trump might have done that. i counsel, donald trump might have done that. . ., , counsel, donald trump might have done that. _, , ., ., done that. i could see how an international— done that. i could see how an international audience - done that. i could see how an international audience might | done that. i could see how an - international audience might scratch their heads and say, how could america — their heads and say, how could america not work out this issue in the last— america not work out this issue in the last 200 years. and my response would _ the last 200 years. and my response would he, _ the last 200 years. and my response would be, we haven't had a donald trump _ would be, we haven't had a donald trump in _ would be, we haven't had a donald trump in the last 200 years. no former— trump in the last 200 years. no former president or current president has ever been charged with a crime, _ president has ever been charged with a crime, it— president has ever been charged with a crime, it certainly that we now have _ a crime, it certainly that we now have to — a crime, it certainly that we now have to grapple with it, we have to -et have to grapple with it, we have to get to _ have to grapple with it, we have to get to the — have to grapple with it, we have to get to the bottom of this. and look, i get to the bottom of this. and look, i would _ get to the bottom of this. and look, i would say, — get to the bottom of this. and look, i would say, like most legal things you go— i would say, like most legal things you go to — i would say, like most legal things you go to the original text, in this case _ you go to the original text, in this case the — you go to the original text, in this case the text of the constitution. the constitution permits for a president to be impeached removed, and then— president to be impeached removed, and then it _ president to be impeached removed, and then it says and then subject to

-bracknell-office , Appeals-court-in-washington-dc , Cases , Special-counsel , Presidents , Allegations , Couldn-t , Office , Trump , Court-made-today-in , Respect , Counsel

The Context

impeachment, not be prosecuted, would be able to order the assassination of one of his political opponents. avoid prosecution, not get prosecuted. they were producing some examples they thought would make an a mockery of what natural justice they thought would make an a mockery of what naturaljustice would suggest. but on the other hand, donald trump's lawyers were pointing out, and i think this has some force as well, that the president does have to have some latitude of movement, some latitude of operation. 0therwise, movement, some latitude of operation. otherwise, there would be a constant cycle of people going after their opponents once they are out of office. the expectation is, gary, that it would go all the way to the supreme court come of this. does the supreme court have to take it up? does the supreme court have to take it u - ? ., ., , �* , does the supreme court have to take itu? ., ., ,�* , ., it up? no, it doesn't. it gets to ick and it up? no, it doesn't. it gets to pick and choose _ it up? no, it doesn't. it gets to pick and choose which - it up? no, it doesn't. it gets to pick and choose which cases i it up? no, it doesn't. it gets to pick and choose which cases it| it up? no, it doesn't. it gets to - pick and choose which cases it takes up. it takes up a very tiny portion of them. having said that, this is

No-one , Examples , Opponents , Assassination , Avoid-prosecution , One , Donald-trump , President , Lawyers , Latitude , Pointing-out , Mockery

The Context

for years, the post office had denied that remote access to branch accounts was possible. in 2015, in written evidence to a select committee inquiry, the company said... but that wasn't true. the post office only admitted it was in fact possible when it was left with no choice during a high court case in 2019. michael rudkin, who was formerly the union rep with the national federation of sub—postmasters, visited the fujitsu's bracknell office back in 2012 and was amazed to discover what access the team had. my chaperone actually started to alter some of the figures in branch of an office. i wish to this day that i'd recorded which office it was, but nonetheless i saw what i saw, i made the comment, "is this in real time?" he said, "yes."

Post-office , Accounts , Access , Company , Written-evidence-to-a-select-committee-inquiry , 2015 , Case , Choice , Fact , High-court , Wasn-t-true , 2019

The Context

the union representing the postmasters say they believe not only did fujitsu have access to the accounts, they could change them in real time. and more problems for boeing. both united and alaska say their mechanics have found loose bolts on a number of their 737 max 9s — the same aircraft that had a door plug blowout mid—flight over oregon last week. good evening. the decision which rests with the us appeals court in washington dc, is of fundemental importance, and not only to the 2024 election. the three judges must decide whether a us president, by virtue of the office he holds, is entitled to exceedingly broad protections from criminal prosecution, for statements and actions taken while in office. should donald trump be excused from the actions he took to overturn the 2020 election. and was his challenge,

Accounts , Number , Postmasters , Problems , United , Mechanics , Bolts , Union , Boeing , Alaska , 737 , Aircraft