Stay updated with breaking news from Bicameral bill. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
but of course, it would also be the hardest to actually prosecute. >> well, it is only the hardest to prosecute, as people say, because it is such an old statute. and it hasn't been used. because we haven't had a lot of presidents inciting and aiding and assisting in insurrections. >> a fair point. >> before. but, you know, the legal power of an old statute is just that isn't it is a statute. there is no doctrine that says that that is too old to be used. so look, you only have to convict somebody, or you only have to make proof that somebody violated one of those three prongs. in trump's case he violated all three of those prongs. he clearly incited an insurrection. robust, bicameral, bipartisan majorities of congress have already determined that he incited an insurrection. but already exists as a legislative fact under our constitutional system. he clearly assisted them at 2:24 pm when he knew that the mob had overrun the house and the senate, driving us out of our chambers, and they were chanting hang mike pence. and instead of calling off the
but, you know, the legal power of an old statute is just that isn't it is a statute. there is no doctrine that says that that is too old to be used. so look, you only have to convict somebody, or you only have to make proof that somebody violated one of those three prongs. in trump's case he violated all three of those prongs. he clearly incited an insurrection. robust, bicameral, bipartisan majorities of congress have already determined that he incited an insurrection. but already exists as a legislative fact under our constitutional system. he clearly assisted them at 2:24 pm when he knew that the mob had overrun the house and the senate, driving us out of our chambers, and they were chanting hang mike pence. and instead of calling off the dogs and trying to involve law
of an old statute is just that isn't it is a statute. there is no doctrine that says that that is too old to be used. so look, you only have to convict somebody, or you only have to make proof that somebody violated one of those three prongs. in trump's case he violated all three of those prongs. he clearly incited an insurrection. in and robust, bicameral, bipartisan majorities of congress have already determined that he incited an insurrection. but already exists as a legislative fact under our constitutional system. he clearly assisted them at 2:24 pm when he knew that the mob had overrun the house and the senate, driving us out of our chambers, and they were chanting hang mike pence. and instead of calling off the dogs and trying to involve law enforcement in stopping his mob
mula, ten points and it must be implemented for our joint security guaranteed for decades ahead and the summit which could be held and president biden supported our -- each of you, ladies and gentlemen can assist an implementation to ensure that american leadership remains solid. bicameral and bipartisan. thank you. you can have sanctions which will make russia feel how its aggression truly is. it is in your power, really to have us bring to justice
solid. bicameral and bipartisan. thank you. [applause] [applause] you can sanctions to make russia feel its aggression truly -- it is in your power, really, to help us bring to justice everyone who started this unprovoked and criminal war. let's do it. [applause] let terrorists -- [applause] [applause] let the terrorists state be held responsible for its terror and aggression and compensate all losses done by this war.
and people against their will. four steps towards peace. from russia which enjoys being a terrorist state. and the russians are still poisoned by the kremlin. the international legal order at our joint task. we need peace. ukraine has already offered proposals which i just discussed with president biden. our peace formula. ten points which must be implemented for our joint security guarantees for the decade ahead. at the summit which can be held. i am glad that president biden supported our peace initiative today. each of you, ladies and gentlemen can assist in the implementation to ensure american leadership remains solid. bicameral and bipartisan.
ukrainians and i'm hopeful and once again, thank you, mr. president, for $45 billion because this is a big assistance. i hope that the congress will approve this financial assistance for our country. this is almost $45 billion. thank you very much for the support. every dollar of this investment for the united states is going to be strengthening of global security. i know that the american leadership will be strong and will play important role in global scope. and the united states will help us to defend our values and independence. and regardless of changes in the congress, i am believe that there will be bipartisan and bicameral support. i know everybody works for this. of course, during all my meetings today, we discussed
we lose what really makes us all important, everything important that we do. and that is the ability to connect to one another on a real basis, on a human basis. >> let's talk about that legislation named after your son. one republican, rand paul, who also suffered a violent attack from his neighbor. he blocked the bill that would keep judges' personal information from showing up online. senator paul refused to meet with you over the summer. but he says he wants the same protection for lawmakers. given the attack at speaker pelosi's house, would you object to amending the bill to include lawmakers? >> you know, i think that congress needs to do what congress needs to do to protect themselves, mr. tapper. but our bill, the judicial security and privacy act, this
bill has been ready for over two years. you know and many people -- i just want to say three numbers. 2, 3, 9. it's been two years, three months, and nine days since my only child was viciously gunned down. judges every day are facing repeated attacks, verbal attempts. the numbers are over-4,000 from last year. we need to act now. and we need to do it now. and this is an urgent matter. and these attacks, like the one on mr. pelosi, are just showing where we are. we're living in a rising tide of tremendous violence, a real clear and present danger exists. and it exists right now for the judiciary. and we have the ability to pass this bill. and i would say that this is a bill that is bipartisan,
down. judges every day are facing repeated attacks, verbal attempts. the numbers are over-4,000 from last year. we need to act now. and we need to do it now. and this is an urgent matter. and these attacks, like the one on mr. pelosi, are just showing where we are. we're living in a rising tide of tremendous violence, a real clear and present danger exists. and it exists right now for the judiciary. and we have the ability to pass this bill. and i would say that this is a bill that is bipartisan, bicameral.