Stay updated with breaking news from Bullet bob. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
How a wooden bedhead saved Ghumdhum's Shahidul in a close call with death bdnews24.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from bdnews24.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Karolina Huebner-Makurat was walking in the Leslieville neighbourhood on July 7 when she was hit after a physical altercation between three men resulted in shots being fired
According to KCPD data, the amount of celebratory gunfire across the city is on the rise. A KC couple has now dealt with two instances since moving into their new house a year ago.
>> could a president who ordered seal team six to assassinate a political rival, who was not impeached, would he be subject to criminal osution? >> if he were impatient and convicted first. >> so your answer is no? >> my answer is qualified yes. there is a political process that would have to occur under the constitution. >> the atlantic's david a grant coals what you just heard there, that clip, quote, perhaps the bullet assertion of any major american candidate has ever made. greg note and his, base that while the framers of the constitution may have assumed a president would be impeached and quickly convicted if he ordered an act of political murder, with the republican party, that what we are seeing, it is have to say that assumption no longer holds. the danger is not a political. if the courts agree with trump and decide that insurrection merits immunity, what could that empower that disgraced ex
argument to a whole new level. >> could a president who ordered seal team six to assassinate a political rival, who was not impeached, would he be subject to criminal prosecution? >> if he were impatient d convicted first. >> so your answer is no? >> my answer is qualified yes. there is a political process that would have to occur under the constitution. >> the atlantic's david a grant coals what you just heard there, that clip, quote, perhaps the bullet assertion of any major american candidate has ever made. greg note and his, base that while the framers of the constitution may have assumed a president would be impeached and quickly convicted if he ordered an act of political murder, with the republican party, that what we are seeing, it is have to say that assumption no longer holds. the danger is not a political. if the courts agree with trump and decide that insurrection merits immunity, what could that empower that disgraced ex president to do if he wins a second term? what kind of green light does
desperate the situation must be. i could hear the emotion in your voice and of course i understand, the fact that it has been 100 days shows such incredible strength on your family's part will stop have you heard anything about the health of your father at the moment? ida. anything about the health of your father at the moment?— anything about the health of your father at the moment? no. so we know that he arrives — father at the moment? no. so we know that he arrives alive _ father at the moment? no. so we know that he arrives alive and _ father at the moment? no. so we know that he arrives alive and we _ that he arrives alive and we know that he arrives alive and we know that was injured and my mum saw him be injured by a bullet shot to him ljy be injured by a bullet shot to him by a hamas terrorist and we was injured and we know that he was rudimentary really treated for those injuries, but we know he's sharing the room with another hostage for the room with another hostage for the first few days and then we don't know any more. so we don't know when he was separated from her but since then we don't know. i he was separated from her but since then we don't know.—
who haven't been impeached or federal officers who have subsequently been convicted. obviously, none of this works with any of the history, any of the texas constitution. it's ludicrous. you think it's frivolous enough that you can imagine a world in which scotus just says -- >> right. here's one of the things i found fascinating. do you know how much questioning they was by the three judges on the impeachment first theory, that's the argument that you have to be impeached and convicted yet? zero. the actual discussion of let's just go through your reading of that, there was no questioning on that. it was all about if you were to lose on that, the case is over. >> right. >> that's true. walk me through this argument. which by the way, was barely in the brief. >> by the way, judge pan, it was fantastic, but her best way of attacking this was really to force donald trump's lawyer to actually say his argument. >> exactly, by the bullet on it. that was the moment.