The doj, their testimony has stood up and they ve appeared entirely credible throughout this ordeal. jason smith, these whistleblowers spoke to your committee, the house ways and means committe your committ what s your reaction to hunter s lawyers demanding that the dojhuemanding prosecute whistleblowers, especially after listening to joes biden whistleblowers? but that was the hearsay whistleblower that was against ay donald trump. one thing about it, sean, when these irs whistleblowers came before the house ways and means committee, their stories has completely stayed the same. but the informatio ation thn that. they released was shocking to members of congress. it was shocking to thetial american public. but, sean, you know who was not shocked about their information? was the department of justice because in fact, the department of justice, justted they as whistleblowers highlighted, they used numerous tactics that delayed the investigation to such a degree that invee of limitations
Janis Anderson Yelton's Crime Mystery Novel "Saving Molly Jane Hampton" Intrigues Readers in Every Page webwire.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from webwire.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Talk about. for example, h the phone call h and the former president had on the morning of january 6th. he left the meeting. he was with his staff and went into another room to take that call. we don t know what was said. so there s a lot that they need to find out that we simply could not find out. you made it a point mark short and john jacob provided valuable testimony. he said publicly he didn t want to testifybl before the committ, and we see a delay at least happening d with the doj. is it your belief he will ultimately end up speaking to the doj in this investigation? do you think the law is really on the doj s side here and we are going to find out answers to those questions? mike pence has certainly told the public ace lot about that d already. my guess is that he will end up testifying. first, this is not a although it s aunprecedented, there s n case law as to a vice president s assertion of speech
Congress to follow through. presidents running for second terms are judged by their record. there s an actual track record for four years that voters will be able to look at and decide if he deserves more time. which is why he doesn t talk about that one shiny object that bodes well in his favor, the committ economy. instead all of this other stuff. that s what republicans would prefer him talking about. unemployment is down. it s a pretty positive case he can make. he s proven time and time again he would much rather talk about other issues. a lot of his immigration actions have been challenged in the courts. does he face the same destiny on this one? we re talking about a million
Point will it ever matter if he is not telling the truth to his base. take a listen to what he said about the wall. they said that progress is being bhemade with this committ. just so you know, we are building the wall anyway. now, you really mean finish the wall. we built a lot of it. it s finish the wall. it s not he s a conman. his reality distortion field has not broken yet. people listen to him and love him. the field is fully in place. black is white, up is down. this is what he ran on. this is all he has. i roll my eyes when people play the or well card. i think people are overreacting