Stay updated with breaking news from Court directives. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Flynn is a defendant without a prosecutor and litigation now without any controversy between the actual parties to the case. Instead of promptly granting dismissal as required as a matter of law, judge sullivan denied two defense motioning opposing any amicus at all, appointed mr. Gleeson to usurp the job of prosecutor, and went forth to right theening wrotes he perceived. To right the wrongs he perceived. The job of the United States attorney is otherwise occupied. In adding these unconstitutional burdens of process to punish Michael Flynn, judge sullivan discarded any semblance of the unbiased, impartial adjudicator this court extolled in the 2019 chapter of that case saga. As a cornerstone of any system of justice worth the label. Four rulings are required to conclude this novel article three excess. Judge sullivans petition for rehearing must be flatly denied with clear lan ....
In our first hour, we will look at the details of this decision by the Trump Administration. Your thoughts on the proposed change, and the larger issue from the federal governments role when it comes to the topic of Greenhouse Gas emissions. It is a call and let us know your thoughts this morning. 202 7488001, republicans. 202 7488000, democrats. Independents, 202 7488002. If you want to reach out to us twitter, you can do that at cspanwj. The Washington Times picks of this decision that started yesterday about the trump theistration, saying longawaited announcement by epa administrator scott pruitt will kickstart repeal proceedings on the rule which limits carbonate Carbon Emissions and was exquisite way designed to reduce the amount of coal burned across ....
Ive learned quite a lot. I, too, w like to associate as myself with the remarks of our chair about how enraged i think we all are when we hear some of the things that weve heard today. I think that just leads us all want to go forth and make sure we do everything we can to cooperate with you to minimize these issues that are out there, if not eliminate them entirely, and i do agree, too, that the role of the internet no doubt has been really important in magnifying the problem multiplying the problem perhaps in many instances, too, so thanks for being here today and i want to thank the chair again for having this hearing. Thank you. Thank you, sir. Mr. Ryan, thank you again for being here. We really appreciate your leadership. Appreciate your commitment to this country and our kids. We join you in that effort, and we look forward to continuing our relationship in that dialogue you spoke of and doing everything we can so that families can build better lives for themselves. With that, se ....
Programs that you otherwise actually support. In fact, those are more drastic remedies, and frankly they wont remedy the problem. They wont force the executive to faithfully execute the laws. If all you want is congress is for the executive to faithfully execute your laws, peaceful judicial resolution may be the most tailored and appropriate response. So all of this reveals a glaring deficiency in those who criticize the committees draft resolution. States can sue to preserve their power. The executive branch it sue to preserve its power but somehow magically congress cant. I guess under this logic congress is some sort of institutional orphan thats uniquely incapable of being injured enough to establish standing to sue. The absurdity of that position is belied by extensive case law that recognizes that subdivisions of congress in the form of committees have standing to assert institutional injury caused by the executive branch. These cases, most of which have been litigated here in th ....
That unless, quote, an agency has adopted a general policy thats so extreme as to amount to an abdomen occasion of its statutory responsibilities. Neither are regulatory delays implementing the employer mandate an affront to the constitution. I think we should take a look at the text of the take care clause. Particularly, the words faithfully and even more striking phrase, take care. The framers could have prescribed simply that the president execute the laws and the legislative history of the constitution shows that they deliberately chose not to do this. Why did they add the words faithfully and especially take care . Defining the president s obligation in this fashion seems to me incorporates that the concept that the president s duty is to execute laws in good faith and to exercise reasonable care in doing so. Scholars concur that this phrasing is that exercise judgment and handle his enforcement duties with fidelity to all laws and the entire law that hes enforcing, the entire aca ....