Stay updated with breaking news from Dynamic legend. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Award-winning rap artist Lioness is gearing up for her debut performance at the highly-anticipated Namibia Tourism Expo, scheduled for 24 to 26 April at the Windhoek Country Club...
violation of the gag order is him re-posting other people's pose about the witnesses, et cetera. >> so interesting to see this kind of dynamic play out and how it impacts this case moving forward. >> and that's why the alternates are gonna be so important because within one within one de, not even 25 periods, you had jurors who felt that their memory had been compromised and therefore did not want to be or could not be impartial. this is why the gold chains are so important here, but also when you go ahead and think about why the judge is saying use common sense. remember there is this notion of prior restraint. the court can't be in a position of telling you what you can pre publish if it's a matter of public record. and yet and still, we an immediate have to have that balance between access to information for the public and a very high interest trial. and also trying to ensure that the process adjusted this is fair. yeah, it's really important to think about there's so much that's happening right now, jim, there are a lot going on. i'm gonna go back to you in washington as we're waiting hey, missy can make finalize this panel of total of 18 even this morning
and questions that certain people wanted to shut down. president biden is also losing support from another key demographic. i just mentioned them, young people. according to a new poll biden leads trump 56-37 among likely voters age 18 to 29. that margin 19 points. at the same time in 2020 biden led by 30 points, double digits. we're tight, ten words from each. >> this is an indication a massive swing. 30 to 19 is a dynamic that you cannot reverse. people have made up their mind. they don't like what is happening. >> i think a lot of these voters have not really made up their mind yet but voicing frustration but not a binary choice. we're 200 days away. they will lean towards biden. >> it's a 45-point swing, deer. >> harris: we ended with a deer, dear. "outnumbered" next.
israel as highly problematic, destabilising. the first time we had seen a direct attack like that. now we see israel possibly back into iran. that itself is a dynamic they are concerned about. as is the fact that there are many other elements to this, many other pieces of the jigsaw in the middle east, the groups funded by iran, which it provides with weapons, in lebanon, in yemen, and all of that adds to a very complicated picture which makes an unstable dynamic, so there may be an unstable dynamic, so there may be a signalfrom one side an unstable dynamic, so there may be a signal from one side to the other that they will take a response, but does that contribute to a d deescalation or an escalation? everyone here wants to see tensions reduced and no room for any miscalculation in reading any of those signals.— miscalculation in reading any of those siinals. ., ., . , those signals. damian grammaticus, thank ou those signals. damian grammaticus, thank you will— those signals. damian grammaticus, thank you will stop _ those signals. damian grammaticus, thank you will stop around _ those signals. damian grammaticus, thank you will stop around the - those signals. damian grammaticus, thank you will stop around the world | thank you will stop around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news.
facilities — pretty close to where its nuclear facilities are. in other words, the military— facilities are. in other words, the military assault that took place in the early— military assault that took place in the early hours of this morning had a political— the early hours of this morning had a political message to it. it was sending — a political message to it. it was sending signals, right? and if you accept _ sending signals, right? and if you accept that analysis, having your security— accept that analysis, having your security minister say this attack was a _ security minister say this attack was a bit — security minister say this attack was a bit lame and undermines the strategy. _ was a bit lame and undermines the strategy, and that is the implication of the criticism here. effectively accusing the security minister— effectively accusing the security minister of undermining what israel is trying _ minister of undermining what israel is trying to— minister of undermining what israel is trying to achieve overnight, which — is trying to achieve overnight, which seem to be a modest and limited — which seem to be a modest and limited strike to respond to last week's— limited strike to respond to last week's massive strike by iran in a way that— week's massive strike by iran in a way that did not necessarily escalate but also sent a warning to iran escalate but also sent a warning to iran that _ escalate but also sent a warning to iran that israel could do more if it wanted _ iran that israel could do more if it wanted. . r' iran that israel could do more if it wanted. ., , ., iran that israel could do more if it wanted. ., ,, iran that israel could do more if it wanted. ., i. ., wanted. let me ask you both one ruestion, wanted. let me ask you both one question. the _ wanted. let me ask you both one question, the same _ wanted. let me ask you both one question, the same question, - wanted. let me ask you both one . question, the same question, before you both go. i will start with you again now, james. where do you think this leaves the dynamic between israel and the us?—
attack on the consulate. it happened on april 1st, but, what the iranians were doing. we are redrawing the red lines. and the problem is that those red lines aren't really set out at the moment. october the 7th changed the dynamic of many of the red lines whether it is proxies, whether it is the direct confrontation between iran and israel. and as they are being redrawn, the possibility of miscalculation or accident becomes that much bigger. and the problem is that could lead to a broader regional war. that is why the time we are in at the moment is so very dangerous. >> alex, thank you. as always, and, for now, we will be going back to you a little later in the program. as we have been saying we are expecting the u.s. secretary of state antony blinken to hold a briefing at the g7 foreign minister's meeting so we will be following that closely as
u.s. and israel dynamic? because the u.s. had urged israel to take the win, to not further respond after that initial iranian attack was repelled? >> well, it's all about the lens you see this through. if you're israel, iran is an existential threat in israel, so they view iran as their number one enemy and so they felt compelled to respond to this. and it's okay because israel is a sovereign nation and if it's an existential threat, they have to demonstrate if they're attacked within israel, they deserve the right to strike back. and it is a good thing that they notified the u.s. because we have interest in the region. we have u.s. troops throughout the region there, and we have to protect them, and so that's my thoughts behind why israel went ahead and did what they had to
concern i think for the us and uk and other allies, g7 countries, is the idea that they saw that original attack from iran into israel as highly problematic, destabilising. the first time we had seen a direct attack like that, now we see israel possibly back into iran. that itself is a dynamic they are concerned about. so too is the fact that there are many other elements to this, many other pieces, the sort of jigsaw in the middle east, iran's group that it funds and supports and provides with weapons, both in lebanon, in yemen, and then all of that adds to a very complicated picture, which means it difficult, unstable dynamic. there may be a signal from unstable dynamic. there may be a signalfrom one side unstable dynamic. there may be a signal from one side to the other then they will take a response, but does that contribute to a de—escalation or an escalation? everybody here wants to see things, you know, tensions reduced and no
understanding and informed about their situation and the inflammation that he has and his understanding this time is that iran is not going to respond to this strike by. israel, that they will not perceive this as crossing a red line. look, anything can change and we know that the dynamic of how israel reads iran's red lines and how iran reads israel's readily hind's has changed. it's gone through, it's gone through a paradigm shift, but this night after this military action inside of iran, carried out by israel, that does not appear to be a follow-up coming from iran that could change, but that it's how it looks at the moment this is reading between the lines from iranian media, how they're characterizing it. nothing to the scale of the big 350 missile attack they launched at
interesting dynamic. michael steele was talking about it, where you have people that are pushing back against the speaker. it is an interesting dynamic. you can get away with that for only so long. i know because we were constantly pushing against newt gingrich to get more, get more, get more when we were trying to get the budget balanced. you can push to a certain degree, and, at some point, you blow up the legislative process enough to get what you want. everybody turns against you. i think that's what we're seeing here. there are a lot of people that have just had enough at the couple of back benchers that are controlling what they do when it comes to ukraine funding. it looks like the speaker, who certainly should be applauded, i will say, for what he's now saying about ukraine, what he's