Go off with injury a short time later and hearts fought hard for an equaliser. alan forrest and frank kent forcing jack butland into action. but rather efforts they could not find a way through and rangers saw dessers get the second of the game just 12 minutes before the end. there was a final flurry of chances for either side but no more goals to be had. chances for either side but no more goals to be had- goals to be had. they started with the riaht goals to be had. they started with the right mentality, goals to be had. they started with the right mentality, they - goals to be had. they started with the right mentality, they want - goals to be had. they started with the right mentality, they want to i the right mentality, they want to score the right mentality, they want to score fast the right mentality, they want to score fast. we put a lot of attention to that. we did at the same attention to that. we did at the same way attention to that. we did at the same way with ross county. and we did it same way with ross county. and we did it and same way with ross county. and we did it and we showed more composure with the did it and we showed more composure with the ball. did it and we showed more composure with the ball- with the ball. frustrated and disappointed with the ball. frustrated and disappointed with with the ball. frustrated and disappointed with the - with the ball. frustrated and i disappointed with the outcome because disappointed with the outcome because obviously disappointed with the outcome because obviously we - disappointed with the outcome because obviously we wanted i disappointed with the outcome. because obviously we wanted to disappointed with the outcome - because obviously we wanted to win. that is because obviously we wanted to win. that is the because obviously we wanted to win. that is the overriding because obviously we wanted to win. that is the overriding emotion - because obviously we wanted to win. that is the overriding emotion at - that is the overriding emotion at the moment that is the overriding emotion at the moment. the that is the overriding emotion at the moment. the game - that is the overriding emotion at the moment. the game got - that is the overriding emotion at the moment. the game got off. that is the overriding emotion atl the moment. the game got off to that is the overriding emotion at i the moment. the game got off to a terrible the moment. the game got off to a terrible start, the moment. the game got off to a terrible start, we the moment. the game got off to a terrible start, we cannot the moment. the game got off to a terrible start, we cannot lose - the moment. the game got off to a terrible start, we cannot lose an . terrible start, we cannot lose an early terrible start, we cannot lose an early cheap terrible start, we cannot lose an early cheap goals terrible start, we cannot lose an early cheap goals like terrible start, we cannot lose an early cheap goals like we - terrible start, we cannot lose an early cheap goals like we did. i terrible start, we cannot lose an early cheap goals like we did. lt| terrible start, we cannot lose an i early cheap goals like we did. it is all set u- early cheap goals like we did. it is all set up for early cheap goals like we did. it is all set up for me
Says they have no opinion, who follows the news and says they follow lawsuits and is up-to- date on things but say they have absolutely no opinion about trump s character, that just strikes me as a little far- fetched. i feel like most people who follow this have an opinion about his character. strike me as more believable of that person said well i have an opinion but i can set it to the side. i can be impartial and just focus on the facts and the law and when those people are trying to, try too hard to seem neutral, those jurors seem like they were red flags. i think a lot of those jurors who were excused and not picked, but there were quite a few on the jury so that will be interesting to watch as we proceed. and what do you make of the anxiety that has been described by journalists around the courtroom? the tears, the emotion, the fear. so the juror number two, the nurse, who found herself being outed on national tv. i mean, that was just heartbreaking. the fact that she would come as
Convey more emotion than information, but in their own reporting on the war, such language has been used repeatedly to describe attacks against israelis by palestinians and almost never in the case of large-scale killing of palestinians at the hands of the israeli military. these examples are part of a larger pattern that has come into focus in the last few months, the weaponization of language, especially language against the state of israel or in support of the palestinian people. let s consider a phrase i m sure you ve heard a lot by now, from the river to the sea, palestine will be free. it comes from the only it has been described as an aspirational call for freedom, human rights, and coexistence, but it appears the representative colleagues don t agree. tuesday, the house pants past resolution condemning the phrase, arguing that it calls
Made. and by the way, it isn t just statements. they have every right if they want to use audio visual effects, they can have a monitoring showing photos of witnesses. they want to they re going to have testify. they can have quotations from depositions all of this again, has to tell a story to get the the jurors to keep them very interested and get the jurors to like them so finally i seriously doubt that donald trump will be able to contain himself during the prosecutors opening statement. he has to sit there quietly, not show any emotion when the prosecutor starts talking about what they intend to prove and all of these allegations against him, which do not make him look good, in which he has consistently denied. so if he fails to contain themselves during the opening statements, if he starts saying something or are conducted some self in a matter that is absolutely inappropriate or disruptive, then you know what he ll be facing a contempt charge in
To testify. so they ll disregard the evidence. i mean, the reality is starstruck or not, it comes down to the okay. you take as a juror and that allows requires that you follow the law. and there are multiple counts here. so are they going to say with respect to every count there s nothing to see here that ledgers fine. that invoice is fine. i just don t know there are 34 counts, but there s only one lie. right? it s just the same lie repeated over and over again. but we know that jurors decide cases based often on emotion and then they back into the logic. so he good do himself a favor by tested. so then how does the defense team work this out? then i assume despite what their client says, that there they start this thinking we d like to keep them off the stand how do you make that calculation as you go, if you think you re losing, you say, okay let s roll the dice, let s put the politician in there. and when a vote is that how you doing wave it s going well for them of cross examination, they will these guys are smithereens. you re turning around and telling your client no way do you get on that stent? now, obviously this
The speaker ship. if i operated out of fear over emotion to vacate i would never be able to do my job. this is a critical time right now. critical time in the world stage. i think that providing legal aid to ukraine is important. i really do. i believe the briefings that i believe putin and xi and iran are an axis of evil and i think putin would continue to march through europe. joining us now, timothy schneider, profess or of history. professor, thank you very much for being here. what does it say that believing united states intelligence united states intelligence about putin and russia puts the republican speakers job at risk? yeah. it says that an important part of the republican party has gotten in the habit of
The jury selection. pardon me? could be part of the deliberation where they will make that decision with the rest of that body. to decide the guilt or innocence of the former president. so they play a critical role just as much as all the other jurors of the 12 that were seated. fascinating jeremy standby for us. i want to now bring in seeing an anchor and chief legal analyst, laura coates, also with a senior editor for above the law job, patrice, to break all of this down, joe, we went through just really the today was a really emotional de in that courthouse because i guess things were getting very, very real for some of these jurors standardly is it typical to see that kind of emotion as people go into a case like this, you don t know. and i think that s that s still roiling. i think in a lot of jurors minds, but i think a lot of juries don t vocalize it as much in a lot of ways. i think this was the gravity of it being a former president and being historic is bringing that out. and i think in some ways that s a really good thing that i don t think any
That it looks ugly, all the people who didn t have the vision that this will change the mobility in the valley completely. the next day, and the grand opening attracts quite a crowd. all: drei, zwei, eins! applause. # madel, fahr mit mir schwebebahn. how was that for you? how are you feeling? oh, it was very emotional and i m really happy that it s now opened. yes, it s. . . it s great. all of your hard work. yes. aww, i can feel the emotion! yes, i think people will come here and then, they will see what a history wuppertal has to tell and what a lovely town it is. and they will go back to their hometown and they will tell, well, we had a really
Attorney will start to develop, you know, hopefully a rapport with the jury. this case, though, is not like any other. it is as intense and we ve seen all the emotion and drama around it. and it is equally more difficult if you don t have the facts and the law isn t on your side. and that s what this prosecutor really is going to be battling in that courtroom. will: yeah, but i can marge i can envision the prosecutor s opening argument. i can almost are hear it before it s made, you know in it ll be highly emotional, nobody s above the law, these types of things but i am curious, so most of the things we have talked about appropriately has to do with the application of the law to this situation and how that s unjust. what will be are the message from donald trump s attorneys in opening argument? what will they be asking how will they be asking the jury to situate their mind? if i m in their shoes, a i m telling the jury right now that reasonable doubt is actually
Around a break for lunch, we got a jury with the alternates. and just as that happened, it felt like it happened in a minute. we got the jury seated. news broke and the overflow room where the reporters were that somebody had set themselves on fire outside the courthouse. just a chill went through the place. that was such a shock. i can t imagine jurors who were seated having heard about it. and i have to wonder now going into monday morning, we have open arguments. jurors will be in the box. we could have someone else say, i can t do this. that is the tension and the emotion which is high all week. when i reflect on that, that is what i think about. for me, picking up where sue left off, it is the difference between theory and practice. you are talking about, in theory, which we have been discussing for the last year plus, what it would be like to have the former president of the united states of america on