Stay updated with breaking news from On the record. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
we had seven counties this morning that had not yet finished. >> ali, there were a lot of people on social media, a lot of people -- i'm sure you were hearing from as a reporter down there who were wondering, given the fact that it is so up in the air, whether the gillum campaign would rescind that concession, concessions are not legally binding and its just a formty and tradition, it doesn't mean anything legally, do you have any report that the gillum campaign plans to change the status of that concession? >> reporter: we've been in contact with the gillum campaign and the line they've continued to say both off the record, on background, on the record, andrew gillum said it himself is urging all the ballots to be counted. they're not going back on the concession. they did in a statement say they made that decision with different information than they have now. those counts have shifted and that race is at a 4% margin.
interview dr. christine blasey ford. >> given how limited these documents were and how limited the scope of this investigation was, we are reiterating our call that the documents with proper reduction be made public. why shouldn't all of america see the facts? >> laura: i think feinstein should have worn a white scarf or surrender. wouldn't that have been more appropriate? democrats wanted a witch hunt and it fizzled over lack ofth evidence. the facts americans will now focus on i think are the ones the left fear the most. the economic record of donald j. trump. jobless claims have dropped into a 49 year low. we now have 4.2% gdp growth with projections now to match or exceed that in the coming quarter. manufacturing jobs, remember president obama said they were never coming back, they are
tomorrow in the the next day. >> laura: doing what? >> we will be out there in the halls and the streets, calling for somebody -- for him to step down and for s us to have a nomination of somebody with a different temperament, of somebody who hasn't lied under oath. d somebody who doesn't have these accusations. and there are tons of people that have squeaky clean records that we could see being nominated. >> laura: so you would be in favor of amy coni barrett? >> i'm not saying i would be favoring them specifically but i think that's a more proper nomination. >> okay we have that on the record. amy coni barrett, more appropriate appropriate then brett kavanaugh. i love this panel. thanks very much. here with reaction on how the white hot house this feeling, we are joined by counselor to the president, kellyanne conway. thank you so much for being here tonight.
that started this whole thing and maybe with the lawyers who they found for her, they were trying aggressively to push dr. ford to be public, so they were actually leaking on dr. ford to get her out there because they wanted the emotions of that hearing. that's what they wanted and they thought that would derail it all. and they got the opposite. >> "the washington post" responded to us today by sayingy no one linked anything to us. she ultimately decided she was willing to put herpu name on the record after reporters from other outlets appeared at her home and workplace, at which time chose to publish her story. again. does thats ring true? >> it's true that "the washington post" didn't go with the story without on the record interviews and try to do a legitimate investigation. i've covered so many of these stories, what happens is, it becomes like an open secret. a source tells one reporter, or the reporters talk to each other and nobody quiteit wants to go with itth because it's an explosive allegation and they don't have the complainant on
the record. eventually it gets out there and someone goes and tries to ambush the person or hang out for a stock them, and that is how eventually it comes about. i believe christine ford was pressured to go public. >> laura: there are things we have to focus on here. this is also regarding whether the triangle -- the devil's triangle. this was chris cuomo and don lemon last night, let's watch. >> how does he sign it? >> he finds it ffff. >> he sure likes making fun of that stuttering guy. >> that is not stuttering. that is not stuttering, do a google search. and devils triangle is not a drinking game. he knows that and everybody else does, except for maybe some sooners who want to believe him. >> laura: other tweets -- this is really fascinating tv.
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20181005:06:24:15 vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
the morning, you see the frustration here that this came upon them just last week and they didn't know about this and filed with the team before last week. there is a lot of frustration and questions about motives. one thing there is agreement on is that the accuser needs to be heard and judge kavanaugh probably needs to be heard again. trying to thread a needle here and the question remained and this is what i heard from aides throughout the day. whatever republican senator, susan collins and lisa murkowski and jeff flake said they need to have concerns addressed. that's likely what's going to have to happen. you saw senator collins making clear there needs to be testimony under oath. she did not say whether that needs to be public, but that's the push from democrats. if republicans start heading in that direction, too, the honest answer is republican leaders don't have much of a choice. right now the chairman of the committee clearly trying to make the point, we are going through a process and the committee has
after the fact, which was very tough. i look to a couple of criteria on this stuff. the named accuser on the record and two contemporaneous reports and helpful as in the roy moore case when they are verifiable. and four, not are necessary, bu they were in the roy moore case. in this case we have a named accuser at this point. the next step would be to hear more from her. if you get more of those things, fine. this is a tough situation for the gop and designed to be one partly by the timing. >> there is no question the timing is unfortunate and complicates everything. the attorney is an esteemed attorney for the woman who is defending feinstein. even her democratic colleagues were not happy about it. she is defending her saying ms. ford was having a hard time
about whether to public publbec or not. a reason to have a hearing. everyone can ask every question. the attorney for the accuser describing in more detail the party where ms. ford alleges brett kavanaugh assaulted her. >> was your client also drinking? >> my client had a beer. she was not stumbling drunk. the men were stumbling drunk. one only needs to look at the writings of mark judge who was the only person present. he and other members were repeatedly, routinely, this was part of their culture. >> mark judge is a former classmate of kavanaugh and cold the weekly standard he has no recollection of this and doesn't believe it happened. he said it would be out of character for them. you have by ms. ford's account, brett kavanaugh and mark judge
is she in conversations with people? have people -- have the lawmakers reached out and tried to talk to her via phone? >> we've heard from no one yet. >> yet. there's supposed to be a vote thursday in the judicial committee. will that happen? joining us now, cnn chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin and nia-malika henderson. thank you for being here. so much has changed in the last hour. >> yes. >> since we last saw you. >> good thing you didn't leave. >> this is a major development. dr. christine blaise-ford who on the record has accused a supreme court nominee of harassment -- >> sexual assault. >> thank you, that is an important distinction, sexual assault, saying she is willing to testify under oath in front of the u.s. senate. >> how do you not let her testify? how do you say thanks, but no thanks? i think it's very difficult for the republicans in charge. if they want to hold this vote