Stay updated with breaking news from Paneta. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Weren t striking the taliban, they were increasing in combat power. we released 5000 prisoners, which regenerated combat power for them. they were able to make advances against the afghan security forces because we weren t doing things to fully support i apologize, time expired, have to suffice. mr. paneta recognized. thank you, i appreciate this hearing. mr. chair. and good afternoon and thank you, gentlemen, for being here, thank you for your service throughout your career of service to our great nation. as an american, veteran of oef, thank you for continuing to remind american public not to reduce service of 800,000 down to two-week chaotic withdrawal, ....
In change of carrying out his agenda. i would agree he has one. neil: i appreciate you mentioning horizontal structure here. when i thought the ratings were flipping on me. julie, can i ask you this? of course. neil: a lot is made of who is in charge doing what. charlie pointed out on paneta, for example there s some very effective ones that come in and save the day. does the administration need it or just does it need to know focus on ceos and jobs and all that. neil: charlie is right. seems to me there s four or five different influences. charlie is right about that. in terms of obamacare, it s easy to repeal it. they have to votes to do it. the question is what do you do with replacing obamacare and the popular provisions that we know ....
Glad he s home. we re all glad for him and his family. we ve got a deal with the fact that secretary of defense paneta refused to make this deal several year ago because we re talking about the defense minister of the taliban, the chief of staff of of their military armed forces. we re letting them go and setting a precedent. here s the question, how many american casualties were incurred capturing these very top people and then just letting them go and why do they then now what we would not do then and then i m sorry, you have to ask yourself, out the timeline here, the hill paper said just this afternoon, in a news alert, this is all an effort to divert attention and to get the narrative away from the v.a., and by the way, you have to ask the question, why are we making these kinds of deals now? real quickly, doug. your response to that because that the a lot of fire thrown in ....
May go to the white house and pressure them to drop hagel, we ll see. there are two tracts, objection toz hagel himself and record in the past and using it as leverage to git more ve - get more information about bengazi. you think bengazi is it answered it would help approximate hagel to sail through or the delay in time will bring up more time to dig up more things about him? state your namely some people who oppose hagel and try to dig up more information on him. failing that even if they don t get the answers in bengazi, a lot of senators and republicans are uneasy of blocking a nominee for defense secretary . i would say that unless really damaging information on hagel comes out, that his nomination will be confirmed when they get back from recess the week after next. we should know in a couplev weeks, chris, thanks. ....
Like kicking the hornest s nest. many are not surprised at mr. brennan s off of the books role. a man according to colleagues is a photogenetic thug. senator mccain in arizona smells blood. where he asked had the 20 or 30 american survivors of bengazi and why wouldn t the media press this issue instead of camping out in front much a stalled cruise ship? lastly, a statement by secretary of defense paneta seems grotesque. the u.s. military is it not a 911 service he said. clearly an announcement of diminished of expects and arrogance and truth are all thry. perhaps he should re-read israeli. you can t vote for than ....