Live Breaking News & Updates on Pretrial services department

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Pretrial services department on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Pretrial services department and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Deadline White House

i mean, i just wonder if those threats end up getting him in more trouble? >> it could. you don't need your jersey accent to understand this is the kind of things that's said at the badda bing. i don't think it rises to the level of a new crime. where i think it will matter is the three judges that have given him pretrial release without any major conditions, could impose a partial gag order on him. that will be problematic, because trump cannot abide by any such order. violating that order could get him a couple days in jail. that may be the easiest way to get him wearing an orange jumpsuit. he has to watch out. if he keeps doing this, that jack smith will request a partial gag order and he'll get it. i want to discuss what happened yesterday as we look to the first pretrial here at the

Threats , Trouble , Jersey-accent , Crime , Things , Kind , Judges , Level , Release , Badda-bing , Three , Trump

BBC News

of opportunities for the defence to push and push _ of opportunities for the defence to push and push and _ of opportunities for the defence to push and push and push _ of opportunities for the defence to push and push and push against. of opportunities for the defence to. push and push and push against the calendar— push and push and push against the calendar to — push and push and push against the calendar to prolong _ push and push and push against the calendar to prolong the _ push and push and push against the calendar to prolong the pretrial- calendar to prolong the pretrial stage _ calendar to prolong the pretrial stage to — calendar to prolong the pretrial stage to get _ calendar to prolong the pretrial stage to get past _ calendar to prolong the pretrial stage to get past november. calendar to prolong the pretrial. stage to get past november 2024. calendar to prolong the pretrial- stage to get past november 2024. i want stage to get past november 2024. want to talk about someone who is considered a key witness according to this indictment, that is the former vice president mike pence serving of course under trump and says the former president asked him to turn against the constitution to help overturn election results and help overturn election results and he said that was something he cannot do. let's listen. the he said that was something he cannot do. let's listen.— do. let's listen. the first time i heard in early _ do. let's listen. the first time i heard in early december - do. let's listen. the first time i l heard in early december summer suggested that as vice president i would _ suggested that as vice president i would he — suggested that as vice president i would be able to decide which votes to accept— would be able to decide which votes to accept or reject, i knew that it was false — to accept or reject, i knew that it was false i— to accept or reject, i knew that it was false. i dismiss it out of hand, but sadly— was false. i dismiss it out of hand, but sadly the president was surrounded by a group of crackpot lawyers _ surrounded by a group of crackpot lawyers that kept tell him what his itching _ lawyers that kept tell him what his itching ears wanted to hear, while i'm itching ears wanted to hear, while i'm in_ itching ears wanted to hear, while i'm in my— itching ears wanted to hear, while i'm in my case to him what i understood was my oath of the constitution to require the president ultimately continued to demand — president ultimately continued to demand that i choose him over the

Indictment , Witness , Defence , Opportunities , Calendar , Push , Stage , And-push-against , Push-and , Someone , Pretrial , Calendar-push

BBC News

control will be with the judge will stop on the volume _ control will be with the judge will stop on the volume of— control will be with the judge will stop on the volume of the - control will be with the judge will. stop on the volume of the discovery and then— stop on the volume of the discovery and then we — stop on the volume of the discovery and then we go— stop on the volume of the discovery and then we go back— stop on the volume of the discovery and then we go back to _ stop on the volume of the discovery and then we go back to the - and then we go back to the scheduling _ and then we go back to the scheduling issues. - and then we go back to the scheduling issues. how- and then we go back to thej scheduling issues. how fair and then we go back to the . scheduling issues. how fair is and then we go back to the - scheduling issues. how fair is it to ten packed — scheduling issues. how fair is it to ten packed in— scheduling issues. how fair is it to ten packed in with _ scheduling issues. how fair is it to ten packed in with one _ scheduling issues. how fair is it to ten packed in with one trial- scheduling issues. how fair is it to ten packed in with one trial after. ten packed in with one trial after another — ten packed in with one trial after another so— ten packed in with one trial after another so it _ ten packed in with one trial after another. so it is _ ten packed in with one trial after another. so it is a _ ten packed in with one trial after another. so it is a little - ten packed in with one trial after another. so it is a little to- ten packed in with one trial after another. so it is a little to say. l another. so it is a little to say. they— another. so it is a little to say. they will— another. so it is a little to say. they will he _ another. so it is a little to say. they will be crying _ another. so it is a little to say. they will be crying all- another. so it is a little to say. they will be crying all the - another. so it is a little to say. they will be crying all the wayl another. so it is a little to say. - they will be crying all the way that they will— they will be crying all the way that they will need _ they will be crying all the way that they will need more _ they will be crying all the way that they will need more time - they will be crying all the way that . they will need more time to prepare. we have _ they will need more time to prepare. we have heard — they will need more time to prepare. we have heard public— they will need more time to prepare. we have heard public statements- we have heard public statements already— we have heard public statements already from _ we have heard public statements already from his _ we have heard public statements already from his lawyer— we have heard public statements already from his lawyer that - we have heard public statements already from his lawyer that the i already from his lawyer that the government— already from his lawyer that the government has— already from his lawyer that the government has had _ already from his lawyer that the government has had two- already from his lawyer that the government has had two and i already from his lawyer that the. government has had two and half years— government has had two and half years so— government has had two and half years so he — government has had two and half years so he should _ government has had two and half years so he should have - government has had two and half years so he should have two - government has had two and half years so he should have two andi government has had two and half- years so he should have two and half years _ years so he should have two and half years that _ years so he should have two and half years that is— years so he should have two and half years. that is absurd. _ years so he should have two and half years. that is absurd. but _ years so he should have two and half years. that is absurd. but there - years so he should have two and half years. that is absurd. but there is. years. that is absurd. but there is provisions— years. that is absurd. but there is provisions in— years. that is absurd. but there is provisions in the _ years. that is absurd. but there is provisions in the speedy— years. that is absurd. but there is provisions in the speedy trial - provisions in the speedy trial clause — provisions in the speedy trial clause for— provisions in the speedy trial clause for a _ provisions in the speedy trial clause for a trial— provisions in the speedy trial clause for a trial event - provisions in the speedy trial clause for a trial event to - provisions in the speedy trial . clause for a trial event to occur within— clause for a trial event to occur within 70 — clause for a trial event to occur within 70 days, _ clause for a trial event to occur within 70 days, one _ clause for a trial event to occur within 70 days, one of- clause for a trial event to occur within 70 days, one of those i clause for a trial event to occur- within 70 days, one of those depends on providing — within 70 days, one of those depends on providing discovery. _ within 70 days, one of those depends on providing discovery. i— within 70 days, one of those depends on providing discovery. i think- within 70 days, one of those depends on providing discovery. i think were l on providing discovery. i think were also there _ on providing discovery. i think were also there will— on providing discovery. i think were also there will be _ on providing discovery. i think were also there will be substantial- also there will be substantial pretrial— also there will be substantial pretrial motion— also there will be substantial pretrial motion practice, - also there will be substantial- pretrial motion practice, motions to dismiss _ pretrial motion practice, motions to dismiss and — pretrial motion practice, motions to dismiss and some _ pretrial motion practice, motions to dismiss and some will— pretrial motion practice, motions to dismiss and some will relate - pretrial motion practice, motions to dismiss and some will relate to - pretrial motion practice, motions to dismiss and some will relate to the | dismiss and some will relate to the first amendment— dismiss and some will relate to the first amendment claims, _ dismiss and some will relate to the first amendment claims, some - dismiss and some will relate to the | first amendment claims, some may pertain _ first amendment claims, some may pertain to— first amendment claims, some may pertain to advice _ first amendment claims, some may pertain to advice of— first amendment claims, some may pertain to advice of counsel, - first amendment claims, some may pertain to advice of counsel, some. pertain to advice of counsel, some may pertain— pertain to advice of counsel, some may pertain to _ pertain to advice of counsel, some may pertain to issues _ pertain to advice of counsel, some may pertain to issues that - pertain to advice of counsel, somej may pertain to issues that perhaps may pertain to issues that perhaps may not _ may pertain to issues that perhaps may not have _ may pertain to issues that perhaps may not have been _ may pertain to issues that perhaps may not have been even _ may pertain to issues that perhaps may not have been even thought l may pertain to issues that perhapsl may not have been even thought of yet i may not have been even thought of yet i think— may not have been even thought of yet i think there _ may not have been even thought of yet i think there will— may not have been even thought of yet i think there will be _ may not have been even thought of yet i think there will be not - may not have been even thought of yet i think there will be not a - yet i think there will be not a substantial pretrial— yet i think there will be not a | substantial pretrial litigation, yet i think there will be not a . substantial pretrial litigation, a lot of— substantial pretrial litigation, a lot of discovery, _ substantial pretrial litigation, a lot of discovery, so _ substantial pretrial litigation, a lot of discovery, so this - substantial pretrial litigation, a lot of discovery, so this gives l substantial pretrial litigation, a . lot of discovery, so this gives lots of opportunities _ lot of discovery, so this gives lots of opportunities for— lot of discovery, so this gives lots of opportunities for the _ lot of discovery, so this gives lots of opportunities for the defence l lot of discovery, so this gives lotsl of opportunities for the defence to push and —

Little , Way , Fodderfor-cross-examination , Ten , Trial , Judge , Control , Discovery , Issues , Another , Volume , Scheduling-issues

Inside With Jen Psaki

here, when it is direct evidence of account that is charged, direct evidence of count 32, there's really no argument that it shouldn't be admitted. so i do think this solidifies the introduction of that taking into evidence. >> so tomorrow, carlos d olivia is such to be a range. as we're waiting for that, what are you watching for and what we see? >> so, i don't think it will be a particularly noteworthy proceeding, i think the special counsel has already said there's no reason for mr. trump or mr. nauta to be there, so it will probably be just mr. de oliveira and his attorney. i suspect you will enter a plea of not guilty, and that will be about it. they'll talk about conditions of release, i expect because mr. nauta and mr. trump or not incarcerated, or detained pretrial, i don't think neither will mr. de oliveira, i think they will impose the same conditions that are on nauta, which is that remember, nauta and trump are allowed to talk to each other about work, and i think the same will apply to mr. de oliveira, but they're not allowed to talk to each

It , Evidence , Count , Argument , Shouldn-t , Olivia , Account , Introduction , Carlos-d , 32 , Trump , Special-counsel

The Ingraham Angle

crime he may have committed during the relevant time period, presumably stuff regarding his lucrative business dealings in ukraine, china, romania and god knows where else. this is an explosive development and begs the question, if all these relationships he had with foreign business interests were on the up and up, now why would the first son and why would his legal team think he needed this expansive immunity deal and why wasn't this known until yesterday? i tell you why, appears lawyers from biden doj and hunter biden's lawyers hid it in paragraph 15, pretrial --

Crime , Business-dealings , Ukraine , China , God , Romania , Son , Question , Relationships , Development , Business-interests , Lawyers

Alex Witt Reports

much into every incremental decision that she makes, but i think that you know, i think you're right. you could say based on this decision, she did not give a slam dunk to the trump team. that was what a lot of people here based on the fact that she is a trump appointee. we know that our judicial system works that way. every judge is appointed by some president. you know, he did a special master ruling early in this case in favor of trump. that was resounded lee rejected by the appeals court. so, i don't know what to read into get. she said may and you're right, that could be delayed, depending on what happens in the pretrial. i mean, they've talked about in that hearing, that 7 to 8 weeks or something like that, could be the length of a trial. we don't. no but it does seem to give the prosecutors exactly what they want, some wiggle room to get this done before the general election. >> yeah. tim, let's talk about the doj investigation into efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. this report that jack smith is

People , Lot , Team , Fact , Decision , Trump-appointee , Slam-dunk , President , Donald-trump , Way , Case , Aileen-cannon-for-trump

The Story With Martha MacCallum

white person. and black defendants are 25% more likely to be held pretrial. meanwhile, twice indicted former president is out campaigning around the country. didn't even have to post bail. yet hundreds of thousands of americans sit behind bars waiting for their day in court. these are the types of lived experiences that we should be addressing in this oversight committee. this is the real two tiered justice system. it's the justice system democrats are trying to fix after four years of donald trump's misuse. congressional republicans, however, are working to make these inequalities worse through their efforts to defund the irs and other democratic priorities included in the inflation reduction act. so since my colleagues claim to want stricter irs enforcement, you would think we would at least agree on giving the irs

Person , President , Country , Didn-t , Campaigning , Pretrial , Bail , Defendants , 25 , Oversight-committee , Thousands , Types

Sunday Night in America With Trey Gowdy

and generally speaking the defendants cannot put up a try by saying, hate it interferes with my charge to drop me a stronger argument is this off specifically not budget amount of time thinking and also judge cannon portable have to make evidentiary rulings and for that can run trial some of those will be subject will be called pretrial into laboratory appeals the software going up through the court as i think that of the various organs were pretty things on some of the those related to evidentiary rulings and discovery much more sound much more likely to be accepted by the judge. trey: you know elliott, you cannot try a sitting president. i guess you could try him from the time that he one of the time that he was inaugurated i guess. so it may come down to the biggest jury trial of all time. but literally the electorate is going to serve as a jury because what i hear you say is that you do not see the federal case getting 2 quarts, before

Argument , Thinking , Defendants , Amount , Charge , Saying , Try , Things , Federal-court , Some , Trial , Discovery

Sunday Night in America With Trey Gowdy

and generally speaking the defendants cannot put up a try by saying, hate it interferes with my charge to drop me a stronger argument is this off specifically not budget amount of time thinking and also judge cannon portable have to make evidentiary rulings and for that can run trial some of those will be subject will be called pretrial into laboratory appeals the software going up through the court as i think that of the various organs were pretty things on some of the those related to evidentiary rulings and discovery much more sound much more likely to be accepted by the judge. trey: you know elliott, you cannot try a sitting president. i guess you could try him from the time that he one of the time that he was inaugurated i guess. so it may come down to the biggest jury trial of all time. but literally the electorate is going to serve as a jury because what i hear you say is that you do not see the federal case getting 2 quarts, before

Argument , Defendants , Charge , Saying , Thinking , Try , Amount , Cannon-portable , Things , Judge , Federal-court , Some

Smerconish

election and pardon himself but he's not wrong in saying his case raises unique questions that need to be litigated pretrial. including the approval of the search warrant for mar-a-lago, the piercing of the attorney- client privilege and the impact of the presidential records act. many will say, treat him like anybody else, but there's a long tradition at the doj of not wanting to act in a way that might be perceiveas political. in the past two decades, for attorneys general, from both partepubcan michael, democrats, air colder in 2012 lotta lynch in 2016 and merrick garland, just last year, wrote a very similar election-year memos about the importance of keeping politi out of investigations and all four hsame language, including this paragraph, quote, mply put, politics must played no role in decisions of the federal investigators or prosecutors regarding any investigations or criminal charges, law enforcement officers and prosecutors may select the timing of

Case , Election , Questions , Mar-a-lago , Impact , Search-warrant , Pretrial , Attorney-client-privilege , Approval , Tradition , Doj , Anybody-else