Live Breaking News & Updates on Shelby countyv holder

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Shelby countyv holder on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Shelby countyv holder and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Attorney General James Leads Coalition to Support Free and Fair Elections

AG James Co-Leads Coalition Supporting Lawsuit Challenging Florida Law that Stifles Voters who Use Drop Boxes for Absentee Ballots.

New-york , United-states , Georgia , Nevada , District-of-columbia , Rensselaer-county , Washington , Florida , Delaware , Minnesota , Rhode-island , Illinois

American Voices With Alicia Menendez-20220117-00:07:00

and bernice, um, mentioned it in that clip. the chief architect of this assault on voting rights is not mitch mcconnell. it's not david duke. it's not whatever boogieman you think is hiding under the -- under the -- under the closet. the chief architect is chief justice john roberts. it is he, who has been an enemy of voting rights and racial equality from his very first job out of law school, which was to oppose the 1982 amendments to the voting rights act. it is john roberts who authored shelby county v. holder which eviscerated section five of the voting rights act, which is basically why we are here right now. it is john roberts in 2020 which swung wide the doors toward gerrymandering and it's john roberts who provided the crucial fifth vote in last year's decision which eviscerated section 2 of the voting rights act. this has all been done by federal society conservatives that have been put on the supreme court and until we stop

Voting-rights , John-roberts , Um , Chief-architect , Hiding , Clip , Assault , Closet , Mitch-mcconnell , Bernice , David-duke , Voting-rights-act

Ayman-20211018-01:15:00

the status quo and seems to start from the assumption that the supreme court's legitimacy must be shielded at all costs. the report claims that it doesn't draw any conclusions, and yet it pretty openly argues against court expansion and threats, clutches its curls that adding justices might add a justice for the first time in history, as if that hasn't already happened. i think this report was a foregone conclusion. the individuals on this commission have a vested interest in not speaking out against the courts, not sticking their necks out and keeping the court largely as it is. when you're looking at it through a very abstract and academic lens, as they did, it's easy to say it's worked okay so far. leave aside shelby county v holder. how bad could it be? the answer is really bad.

It , Supreme-court , Report , Doesn-t , Legitimacy , Assumption , Conclusions , Costs , Status-quo , Justice , History , Time

The Beat With Ari Melber

to be enough to declare it a bush victory. a de facto victory to george w. bush's campaign for president. >> that's how it went down. messy, confusing. this was just real late-night rulings. a legal victory that proved to be one of the court's most controversial. indeed, the supreme court's foray's into elections and voting rights has earned it some of the biggest bruises in the public minding. you'll recognize some more mickelson journalists. >> the supreme court has upheld the health care law. >> what a day, a landmark 5-4 ruling. >> a law that will improve the lives of millions of americans. >> shelby county v. holder is one that i believe will go down to the annals of history. >> this decision strikes down a key part of the voting rights act. >> the supreme court by a vote of 5-4 has struck down the

President , Victory , Campaign , Georgew-bush , De-facto , One , Supreme-court , Voting-rights , Elections , Rulings , Bruises , Minding

Georgia election law prevents African American, Latinx, others from exercising the right to vote


ADVERTISEMENT
John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, introduced as H.R. 4 in the 116
th Congress and soon to be reintroduced, responds to current conditions in voting today by restoring the full protections of the original, bipartisan Voting Rights Act of 1965, which was gutted by the Supreme Court in 2013. Leading to several states passing sweeping voter suppression laws that disproportionately prevent minorities, the elderly, and the youth from voting.
The legislation provides the tools to address these discriminatory practices and seeks to protect all Americans’ right to vote and creates a new coverage formula that applies to all states and hinges on a finding of repeated voting rights violations in the preceding 25 years. States that have repeated and persistent violations will be covered for a period of 10 years, but if they establish a clean record moving forward, they can come out of coverage.

Georgia , United-states , Alabama , Shelby-county , Fulton-county , Americans , American , Martin-luther-king-jr , Sheila-jackson-lee , Coretta-scott-king , George-wallace , Supreme-court

Editorial: Voting access, and our democracy, under assault


Editorial: Voting access, and our democracy, under assault
Express-News Editorial Board
FacebookTwitterEmail
President Donald Trump speaks to his supporters at the Save America Rally on Jan. 6 — before the insurrection. Another assault on democracy is occurring with a raft of voter restriction laws in states across the nation.Yuri Gripas /TNS
The storming of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 was a violent, bloody and deadly assault on democracy. Not a merely symbolic one as the insurrectionists breached and desecrated “The People’s House,” but a physical assault on voting and free elections.
Propelled by former President Donald Trump’s lie that he’d beaten Joe Biden in the presidential election, the insurrectionists attempted to stop the counting and certification of the Electoral College vote. Those ballots were in wooden boxes on the Senate floor.

Arizona , United-states , Georgia , Shelby-county , Texas , American , Justice-amy-coney-barrett , Supreme-court , Arizona-republican-national-committee , Justice-department , Brennan-center , Election-day

Supreme Court appears to favor upholding voting laws lower court found unfair to minorities


Supreme Court appears to favor upholding voting laws lower court found unfair to minorities
Robert Barnes, The Washington Post
March 2, 2021
FacebookTwitterEmail
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Tuesday seemed inclined to make it more difficult to challenge widely used voting laws that in practice might be more of a burden to minority voters.
The justices spent two hours in a teleconference hearing reviewing the protections provided by the Voting Rights Act, first passed in 1965 to forbid laws that result in discrimination based on race.
The cases involve two voting regulations in Arizona that are in common use across the country. One throws out the ballots of those who vote in the wrong precinct. The other restricts who may collect ballots cast early for delivery to polling places, a practice then-President Donald Trump denounced as "ballot harvesting."

Arizona , United-states , Georgia , Washington , Americans , Katie-hobbs , Amy-coney-barrett , Jimmy-carter , Diarmuid-oscannlain , Justice-john-roberts , Michael-carvin , William-fletcher

CASEY: The former 'Capital of the Confederacy' rings a bell for voters' rights

Virginia's legislature just became the first in the South to enact a voters' rights law that in certain ways mirrors national protections that evaporated suddenly in 2013.

Arizona , United-states , Georgia , Alabama , Texas , Alaska , Virginia , Shelby-county , Richmond , American , Chris-head , Jennifer-mcclellan