Stay updated with breaking news from Weird barbie . Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
night last week we were talking on the show about the siberian energy group on the right and we accidentally showed the website of the siberian energy group on the left. i m sorry about that. you can understand why we might mix those up. the live siberian energy group versus the dead siberian energy group. interesting. the reason we even know we made that mistake and put up the website is this article on politico.com concerning the murky origins of half a million dollars paid to former security advisor mike flynn. the siberian group is the only publicly traded gas and exploration company in the u.s. that has 100% of its assets in russia. siberian energy group. part of what politico talked about last week and we told you on the show, there is a link between the ceo of that now defunct siberian energy group and the guy who paid mike flynn more than half a million dollars mike flynn did not disclose on his security clearance application in washington. this is the money that ....
this is something the president predicted was right was never a legal basis for this, correct? president trump won the legal argument today. and the supreme court came out on his side and lifted the stay that the appeals court put in place. but the legal argument was never the strongest argument against the ban. it s the policy argument. really bad policy. tucker: will you concede that there was a legal argument against it, that the left as a group made and it was that a single judge in hawaii had more power over america s foreign policy and control of america s borders than the president did and the supreme court today said that s absurd. it wasn t just hawaii, tucker. there were a number of court cases in a number of courts that stayed this travel order. and it was a close call legally. it was a close call for the appeals court that upheld the stay. it was also a close call for the supreme court. tucker: the president has got a right to make judgments like this and enfor ....
democrat wins in ohio, michigan, or give me a name. i like tim ryan in ohio, and i like my mayor out of palm beach out of miami in florida. nick, katherine, harold, that will do it for hardball. chris matthews is back here on monday. all in with chris hayes starts right now. tonight on all in. he wanted to have dinner because he wanted to stay on. dinner with comey. he mentioned that he had been invited to the white house to have dinner with the president and that he was uneasy with that. new reporting contradicting the president s claims. and tonight, new questions about oval office recordings. did president trump record his conversations with former fbi director comey? as the president threatens his former fbi director with tapes. plus, as the deputy attorney general reportedly signals no special prosecutor should we do the pledge? raise your hand. who else was asked to take the donald trump pledge? then david cay johnston. and my ex ....
they did not defund planned parenthood. they definitely don t want to build a border wall. but now almost ten months into the republican congress, top republicans on capitol hill have finally found an issue they can really rally around. preserving president obama s immigration policy. the trump administration has announced that next tuesday will decide the fate of daca, the obama era program which apparently illegally gives work permits to illegal immigrants who arrived in the country as children. killing that program would fulfill one of the term campaigns promise. it would also fit with the republican party s stated position against amnesty and in favor of enforcing the law rather than granting politicized immunity. scrambling to preserve daca. this morning in a radio interview, speaker paul ryan begged the president to keep the program in place until congress can pass a bill granting amnesty to the illegal immigrants daca covers. i actually don t think you should do that.
that s why we have a president. you will concede that. i think that s a valid argument and that s the argument that was made. that s one of the arguments that persuaded the supreme court today. although, keep in mind, that the court only lifted the stay. it will hear the merits of the case in october. but, yes, you are right. but, as i said, the stronger argument against this travel ban is it s really bad policy. it doesn t accomplish the goal which is no-to-make america safer. tucker: it doesn t. you would argue the counter case that the more immigrants that we have from say somali coming into the country the safer we are? what point are you making. what i would argue on policy grounds this ban is both too broad and not broad enough. let me explain. here s why it s too broad. it denies muslims from six predominantly muslim countries. tucker: let me stop and correct you. it makes no reference to religion at all. it doesn t badge muslims. it bans people who live in six coun ....